Skip to main content

Security report for gutshaus-gramkow.de

Gutshaus Gramkow · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gutshaus Gramkow is a small hospitality business located in Germany offering family-friendly vacation rentals on a historic farm near the Baltic Sea. The website provides detailed information about their Ferienwohnungen (vacation apartments), on-site restaurant, and recreational activities for families and individuals. The business targets families, couples, and individuals seeking a rural vacation experience with access to nature and local attractions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools integrated, including Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is addressed with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism in place. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate and professional small hospitality business with a strong regional focus.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gutshaus-gramkow.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gutshaus-gramkow.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gutshaus-gramkow.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on vacation rentals and family-oriented farm stays near the Baltic Sea. Their competitive advantage lies in the unique farm setting, family-friendly amenities, and proximity to regional attractions. Revenue streams likely include apartment rentals and restaurant services. The company maintains active social media profiles to engage customers and uses third-party booking platforms (app.mews.com) for reservations. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanding service offerings. The partnership with Mews indicates integration with modern booking technology. The business model is straightforward, targeting leisure travelers seeking rural and family vacations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture for a small business, with HTTPS enabled and consent management implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security policies or incident response information is a gap. Security headers are not explicitly present, which could be improved to harden the site. The use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha indicates some protection against automated abuse. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security headers and documented incident response procedures to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gutshaus Gramkow
Description
Familienurlaub auf dem Bauernhof an der Ostsee. Ferienwohnungen, Restaurant und ein Spielplatz auf der Ferienanlage mit Pferden.
Key services
Ferienwohnungen (vacation apartments), Restaurant services, Family and children activities, Animal interaction and farm experience
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, NextGEN Gallery plugin, Cloudflare Turnstile (captcha)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management platform implemented
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode configured
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality site offering farm vacation rentals near the Baltic Sea.
  2. Good use of SEO and structured data (JSON-LD) for business and webpage.
  3. Consent management and GDPR compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager with consent mode enabled.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with Yoast SEO and NextGEN Gallery plugins, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking with consent mode enabled, reflecting privacy-aware analytics practices. The site uses Usercentrics CMP for GDPR compliance and Cloudflare Turnstile for bot protection. Performance is moderate with minified CSS and JS assets, but no explicit performance metrics were available. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Overall, the technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small hospitality business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gutshaus-gramkow.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gutshaus-gramkow.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.