Skip to main content

Security report for gutscharity.org.uk

Guts UK · Healthcare · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Guts UK is a UK-based national charity dedicated to improving understanding, treatment, and support for digestive system conditions. The organization provides expert patient information, funds medical research, and runs awareness campaigns. It operates primarily through donations and fundraising efforts, positioning itself as the sole UK charity funding research across the entire digestive system. The website reflects a professional, well-branded presence with clear calls to action and comprehensive content tailored to patients, healthcare professionals, and supporters. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Gravity Forms, Bootstrap, and various analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. Hosting is provided by Fasthosts Internet Ltd, and the site employs HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a solid security posture. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and structured data implemented. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses security headers, and handles forms securely. However, it lacks publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are recommended for enhanced trust and compliance. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, supporting user data protection. Overall, Guts UK’s website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance suitable for a healthcare charity. Strategic improvements include publishing explicit security policies and incident response information to further strengthen trust and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gutscharity.org.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gutscharity.org.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gutscharity.org.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Guts UK holds a unique market position as the only UK charity funding research into the entire digestive system, serving patients, researchers, and healthcare professionals. Its business model relies on donations, fundraising, and grants, supported by a strong digital presence and community engagement. The charity maintains active social media channels and partners with Reason Digital for website development and a third-party donation platform for payment processing. The organization’s growth is indicated by consistent content updates, campaigns, and a well-maintained website. The charity’s operations are transparent with clear contact information and trust certifications, enhancing donor confidence and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and secure form handling. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Tracking and marketing scripts are used responsibly with cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response contact details, and vulnerability disclosure channels represents a compliance gap. These omissions could impact incident handling efficiency and user trust in the event of a security issue. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve readiness and trust.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms with granular user controls and detailed disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Guts UK Charity
Registration number
1137029
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Guts UK
Description
Guts UK is the national charity for the digestive system. They provide expert information and support for digestive conditions and symptoms, raise awareness, educate the public about digestive health, and fund research into the whole digestive system.
Key services
Patient information and support, Research funding, Awareness campaigns, Fundraising and donation facilitation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Fundraise Up, Hustle plugin, Relevanssi Live Search, jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Moment.js, Daterangepicker
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with AJAX handling

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Fundraise Up, Hustle plugin
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong focus on digestive health charity activities and research funding.
  3. Multiple calls to action for donations and fundraising.
  4. Good use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  5. Comprehensive contact information and social media presence.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  9. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Gravity Forms for data collection, and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. Hosting is managed by Fasthosts Internet Ltd, a reputable UK provider. Performance is moderate with optimizations such as lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are implemented, including ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of plugin updates and security patches is advised to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gutscharity.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gutscharity.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.