Skip to main content

Security report for gurgl.com

Hospitality · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gurgl.com presents itself as a tourism and hospitality platform focused on alpine holidays in Obergurgl & Hochgurgl, offering skiing, hiking, and nature relaxation experiences. The content is professionally presented with good design quality and clear navigation, targeting tourists and holidaymakers interested in alpine vacations. The technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript libraries and modules, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms denying ad personalization by default, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS registrant data and privacy policy pages introduces some trust concerns. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gurgl.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on alpine tourism. It likely generates revenue through accommodation bookings, ski passes, and related services. The website links to multiple partner domains related to the Oetztal region, indicating a partnership ecosystem supporting regional tourism. The target customer segment includes leisure travelers seeking winter and summer alpine experiences. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on experience and relaxation. Growth indicators and market position are not explicitly stated. The lack of detailed company information and contact details limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism that denies ad personalization by default, reflecting a basic commitment to user privacy. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, and no published security or incident response policies are available. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security.txt files. The absence of registrant WHOIS data reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in security headers, transparency, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Obergurgl & Hochgurgl – your hideaway in the Alps. Whether skiing, hiking, or simply unwinding in nature, Gurgl offers high-alpine experiences and pure relaxation at over 1,800 m.
Key services
skiing, hiking, holiday accommodation, nature relaxation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, Rive, JavaScript modules
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with ad personalization denied by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about alpine holidays.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible new domain or privacy protection.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with denial of ad personalization by default.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple Google Tag Manager IDs and Google Ads scripts detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Website uses modern JavaScript modules and libraries for UI and interactivity.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries such as GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, and Rive for interactive and animated content. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management. The site uses module-based JavaScript loading and appears mobile optimized with responsive design. Performance is moderate with preloading of key scripts and styles. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding accessibility enhancements and optimizing security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gurgl.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gurgl.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.