Skip to main content

Security report for gurgl-carat.com

Gurgl Carat · Hospitality · Austria

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gurgl Carat is a professional event and congress venue located in the Ötztal/Tirol region of Austria, catering to events with up to 500 attendees. The website presents a modern and well-structured digital presence, utilizing advanced technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent management, and interactive JavaScript libraries. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content focused on event hosting services. However, the absence of publicly accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as missing contact information, limits full transparency and user trust. The security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and should be further investigated. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance documentation and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gurgl-carat.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, specifically targeting corporate and private event organizers in the Alpine region. Its market position is strong locally as a top event location with state-of-the-art technology offerings. The business model revolves around venue rental and event hosting services. The website links to several regional tourism and partner domains, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. No direct revenue streams or detailed company registration data are available from the site. The lack of explicit contact details and corporate identifiers suggests a need for improved business transparency online.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent management compliant with GDPR principles, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report vulnerabilities. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved with additional headers, transparency, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure transparency and legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gurgl Carat
Description
Gurgl Carat is the top event location in Ötztal/Tirol. Events for up to 500 people take place here by using state-of-the-art technology in a unique setting.
Key services
congress and event hosting, state-of-the-art technology for events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, GSAP, Swiper, Leaflet, Rive
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Hubspot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content
  4. No explicit contact information or emails found in the HTML content
  5. Use of multiple Google Tag Manager containers and Cookiebot for compliance and analytics
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with libraries such as GSAP for animations, Swiper for sliders, Leaflet for maps, and Rive for interactive graphics. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags, and Cookiebot manages cookie consent. The site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with module preloading and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and labels present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. The site could improve by adding more accessibility features and optimizing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gurgl-carat.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gurgl-carat.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.