Skip to main content

Security report for gtmflagship.com

GTM North America · Hospitality · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GTM North America operates as a professional event organizer within the travel and hospitality industry, focusing on connecting travel advisors and suppliers through networking events. The website promotes an upcoming event in July 2026 and provides detailed information about the event, sponsors, and advisory board. Technically, the site is built on Squarespace, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises legitimacy concerns, though the professional site design and active social media presence suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gtmflagship.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets travel industry professionals, offering event-based networking and sponsorship opportunities. Its business model revolves around event hosting and industry engagement. The market position is niche, focusing on travel advisors and suppliers primarily in North America. The partnership with GTM by Northstar indicates a broader ecosystem. Revenue likely derives from event participation fees and sponsorships. The website content and social media presence support a credible industry presence, though lack of detailed company registration data limits full business intelligence. Growth potential exists through expanded event offerings and enhanced digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and HSTS headers, reducing risks of man-in-the-middle attacks. However, the lack of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program is present. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing site but should be improved to meet compliance and transparency standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure information to improve security transparency.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GTM North America
Description
GTM North America is an organization focused on connecting travel industry professionals, including travel advisors and suppliers, through events and networking opportunities. The site promotes an event scheduled for July 9-11, 2026, at The Diplomat Beach Resort in Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood, FL. It provides information about the event agenda, location, advisory board, sponsors, and testimonials.
Key services
Event hosting, Networking opportunities, Industry sponsorships, Information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts, JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace with professional design and clear navigation.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Social media presence is active with Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter links.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found; contact is via forms and social media.
  6. HTTPS and HSTS are properly configured, indicating good SSL security.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content; content is safe and professional.
  9. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  10. No visible certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, utilizing modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses Typekit for fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, typical for a CMS-based site. Hosting is via Squarespace CDN, ensuring reliable uptime and SSL support. There is no evidence of custom backend frameworks or complex integrations. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in SEO and accessibility could be made. The site lacks advanced security headers beyond HSTS and could benefit from additional security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gtmflagship.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gtmflagship.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.