Skip to main content

Security report for gsbz-buchholz.de

Krankenhaus Buchholz und Winsen gemeinnützige GmbH · Healthcare · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gsbz-buchholz.de represents the Gesundheitsfachschule und Bildungszentrum Buchholz, affiliated with the Krankenhäuser Buchholz und Winsen gemeinnützige GmbH. It serves as a portal for healthcare education, training, and employment opportunities in the Buchholz and Winsen region of Germany. The site targets prospective students and job seekers interested in healthcare professions, providing detailed information about training programs, career paths, and affiliated hospitals. The business operates as a non-profit healthcare and educational institution, positioning itself as the largest employer in the region with a strong community focus. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS, utilizing modern frontend libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, and the site is served over HTTPS with no visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, there is no cookie consent mechanism or explicit security and incident response policies published, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site maintains a good posture with HTTPS and no detected vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers and incident response information slightly reduces the security maturity. Privacy compliance is adequate with a clear privacy policy and terms of service, but the lack of cookie consent and data protection officer contact details indicates partial GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its business goals. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, enhancing accessibility, and adding security headers to improve compliance and security posture further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gsbz-buchholz.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and education sectors, focusing on training healthcare professionals and providing employment opportunities. It holds a strong regional market position as the largest employer in its area. The business model is non-profit, emphasizing community service and workforce development. Revenue streams likely include public funding and educational program fees. The target customer segments are prospective healthcare students and job seekers. The partnership ecosystem includes affiliated hospitals and a dedicated job portal. Growth indicators include active news updates and a comprehensive training curriculum. Strategic observations suggest a stable operation with opportunities to enhance digital maturity and compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. No vulnerable libraries or scripts were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published incident response or security policies indicate gaps. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms and no visible data protection officer contact. The organization should improve transparency around security and privacy practices and implement technical controls to enhance protection. No critical vulnerabilities were found, but improvements would reduce risk and increase trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Krankenhaus Buchholz und Winsen gemeinnützige GmbH
Description
Stellenportal der Krankenhäuser Buchholz und Winsen offering information about training, education, career opportunities, and job listings in healthcare.
Key services
Healthcare education and training, Job placement and career services, Hospital services via affiliated hospitals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Owl Carousel, FontAwesome
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare education and employment.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. Clear contact info with email and phone present.
  5. No social media links found in HTML content.
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Good use of TYPO3 CMS and modern frontend libraries.
  9. External links mostly to affiliated hospital websites and job portal.
  10. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, ensuring maintainability and scalability. Frontend technologies include jQuery, Owl Carousel for image sliders, and FontAwesome for icons. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting details are not explicit, but DNS uses UI-DNS name servers. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools, indicating a focus on content and user information rather than aggressive marketing. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gsbz-buchholz.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gsbz-buchholz.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.