Skip to main content

Security report for gsaplatform.eu

GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. · Energy · Poland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The GSA Platform, operated by GAZ-SYSTEM S.A., is a specialized online platform facilitating auctions and secondary market transactions for gas transmission capacity and LNG terminal services across Europe. It serves gas transmission operators, market participants, and LNG terminal operators, providing tools for booking long-term capacity and managing incremental capacity. The platform is positioned as a key player in the European energy sector, offering transparent and regulated capacity allocation services. Technically, the website employs a modern but moderate tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome, hosted by OVH SAS. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with basic accessibility and SEO features. Security practices include CSRF tokens and cookie consent mechanisms, but there are notable weaknesses such as password input fields not using secure input types and lack of visible security headers. From a security perspective, the platform demonstrates a reasonable posture with encrypted communications (assumed HTTPS), but improvements are needed in input handling and security header implementation. Privacy compliance is supported by accessible privacy and cookie policies, with GDPR considerations evident. Contact information is comprehensive, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the platform is a professional, trustworthy service with a solid business model and clear market focus. Security and privacy practices are adequate but could be enhanced to meet higher standards. No critical vulnerabilities or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gsaplatform.eu

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
100
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The GSA Platform operates in the energy and transportation sectors, specifically focusing on gas transmission capacity auctions and secondary market services. Its business model revolves around providing a digital marketplace for capacity booking, targeting transmission system operators and market participants. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its official operation by GAZ-SYSTEM S.A., a major Polish gas transmission operator, lending credibility and regulatory alignment. Revenue streams likely include fees from auction participation and platform services. The presence of a 24/7 helpdesk and named customer relations manager indicates strong customer support. The platform's partnership ecosystem includes LNG terminal operators and European gas market stakeholders. Growth indicators include continuous platform development and expanding functionalities such as secondary market automation. Strategic observations highlight the platform's role in facilitating EU regulation compliance and market transparency.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. Positive aspects include the use of CSRF tokens in forms, cookie consent mechanisms, and masked password input display via JavaScript. However, the actual password input field is of type 'text', which is a security concern as it exposes user input to potential shoulder surfing or logging. No explicit security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, limiting transparency on handling security events. The platform appears to comply with GDPR through privacy and cookie policies but lacks explicit vulnerability disclosure or security contact channels. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a regulated platform but requires improvements in input handling, header implementation, and incident response readiness to enhance resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Change all password input fields to use type='password' to secure user credentials during entry.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing a dedicated data protection officer contact.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GAZ-SYSTEM S.A.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GAZ-SYSTEM S.A.
Description
The GSA Platform is a capacity booking platform operated by the Gas Transmission Operator GAZ-SYSTEM S.A., facilitating auctions and secondary market transactions for gas transmission capacity and LNG terminal services in Europe.
Key services
Long-term capacity auctions, Secondary market offers and contracts, Incremental capacity management, Market information and reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Base64 JS library
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Password input masking
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a specialized platform for gas transmission capacity auctions and secondary market.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at industry participants.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Security practices are present but could be improved, especially password input handling.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible.
  6. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. Contact information is comprehensive and includes named personnel.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No analytics services detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Font Awesome for icons, and a Base64 JavaScript library. The hosting provider is OVH SAS, a reputable European hosting company. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta description content and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. Forms include CSRF tokens indicating attention to security in form submissions. The password input implementation is flawed, using a text input masked by JavaScript, which is not a best practice. The site lacks visible security headers and analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gsaplatform.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gsaplatform.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.