Skip to main content

Security report for grupoamper.com

Amper S.A. · Energy · Spain

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grupo Amper is a Spanish industrial and technological group with over 60 years of history, specializing in defense, security, communications, energy, and sustainability sectors. The company positions itself as a leader in technological and industrial strategic capabilities with a significant international presence. Their key services include defense and security solutions, energy and sustainability services, and telecommunications. The website reflects a professional corporate presence targeting businesses and government entities in these sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and LiteSpeed Cache. It employs modern tracking and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and structured data implementation, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy, which impacts the overall trustworthiness assessment. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich, but the discrepancy in WHOIS data suggests a need for further verification of domain registration. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and clarifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grupoamper.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grupo Amper operates in highly regulated and strategic sectors such as defense, energy, and telecommunications, which require strong technological and engineering capabilities. The company leverages its long history and stock market presence to maintain a competitive advantage. Its business model focuses on providing integrated technological solutions and engineering services to government and industrial clients. The presence of official contact information and structured data supports transparency and credibility. The company’s international presence and leadership in strategic markets indicate growth potential and a robust partnership ecosystem, although no explicit partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which is a gap in security culture and readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Hotjar and Google Tag Manager introduces potential risks that require regular auditing. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies, but explicit data retention policies are not found. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to strengthen legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amper S.A.
Description
Amper es un grupo empresarial español con más de 60 años de historia que cuenta con una presencia importante en los mercados de Defensa, Seguridad y Comunicaciones y Energía y Sostenibilidad
Key services
Defense and Security solutions, Energy and Sustainability services, Telecommunications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, LiteSpeed Cache
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  3. No WHOIS registration data available, raising legitimacy questions
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism
  5. No explicit terms of service found
  6. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure info
  7. Contact info includes official company email and phone
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Moderate use of tracking and analytics tools
  10. Good SEO and structured data implementation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a standard but effective content management approach. The use of LiteSpeed Cache suggests efforts to optimize performance, though the overall loading speed is moderate. The site includes modern tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior insights. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. The technical stack is typical for corporate websites but would benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grupoamper.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grupoamper.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.