Skip to main content

Security report for groenehart.nl

Het Groene Hart · Hospitality · Netherlands

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Het Groene Hart website serves as a regional tourism portal promoting the Groene Hart area in the Netherlands, highlighting natural landscapes, cultural heritage, and recreational activities. The site targets tourists and visitors seeking authentic Dutch experiences in nature and historic towns. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Angular framework, Google Tag Manager, and performance optimizations such as font preloading and instant.page for faster navigation. The website is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including structured data and Open Graph metadata. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent mechanisms, and standard security headers, though it lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with GDPR requirements, making it a reliable source for regional tourism information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching groenehart.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a key regional tourism promoter for the Groene Hart area, leveraging cultural and natural assets to attract visitors. Its business model focuses on information dissemination and visitor engagement rather than direct sales. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a centralized contact form approach. The site integrates Google Analytics for visitor insights and uses cookie consent to comply with privacy laws. The organization appears medium-sized with a focus on hospitality and government sectors. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found. The site’s consistent branding and comprehensive content support its market position as a trusted regional tourism authority.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and standard security headers implemented. Cookie consent is granular and respects user privacy by denying ad personalization and marketing cookies by default. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents a compliance gap. The site would benefit from publishing these documents to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security risk is low but could be improved with formalized policies and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add explicit contact details including phone numbers and emails for business and support inquiries to improve trust.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy policies to maintain GDPR compliance and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Het Groene Hart
Description
Promotes the Groene Hart region in Holland as a natural, cultural, and recreational destination with historical sites, nature, and activities.
Key services
Event listings, Visitor planning, Tourism information, Local attractions and activities, Accommodation and dining guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Instant.page (preloading), Custom JavaScript bundles, CSS with preloading fonts
Frameworks
Angular (indicated by _ngcontent attributes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security_storage consent granted only

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong focus on regional tourism and cultural heritage promotion.
  3. Good implementation of privacy and cookie consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact primarily via forms.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Angular-based frontend with asynchronous loading of JavaScript bundles and font preloading to optimize performance. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA attributes. SEO is enhanced with meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for search engines. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in hosting and asset delivery. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with groenehart.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review groenehart.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.