Skip to main content

Security report for grodan.se

Grodan · Hospitality · Sweden

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grodan is a hospitality business operating classic Swedish-French restaurants and event venues in central Stockholm, Sweden. The website presents two main locations and offers dining and event hosting services. The site is professionally designed with good content quality and clear navigation, targeting general audiences interested in dining and events in Stockholm. The business model focuses on restaurant services and event spaces, positioning Grodan as an established local player in the hospitality sector. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, CookieTractor for cookie consent management, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS with secure cookies and CSRF protection tokens, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published privacy or security policies. No contact information for incident response or vulnerability disclosure is provided, which limits transparency and responsiveness. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.grodan.se raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content itself appears legitimate and professional. Overall, the website scores moderately well in content quality, technical implementation, and security posture but is penalized for missing privacy policies, contact details, and unclear domain registration data. Strategic improvements in transparency, security headers, and domain verification are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grodan.se

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grodan operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on classic Swedish-French cuisine and event hosting in Stockholm. The business targets local and visiting customers seeking dining and event venues. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Ads and Facebook Pixel to reach its audience. The website's clear branding and consistent messaging support its market position as a reputable restaurant chain with multiple locations. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or contact information limits external validation of business credentials. The use of cookie consent and analytics tools indicates awareness of digital marketing and compliance requirements, though privacy policy publication is lacking. The business appears medium-sized with a stable local presence but could benefit from enhanced digital transparency and security disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection via cookies. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive, allowing users to control tracking cookies. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit privacy policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and other regulations. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues or use of a subdomain, which could affect trustworthiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the site is secure for general use but requires improvements in transparency and security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve security transparency.
  5. Verify and update domain registration information to ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grodan
Description
Klassisk restaurang i centrala Stockholm med svensk-fransk meny & festvåningar. Grodan finns på Grev Turegatan & Kungliga Operan.
Key services
restaurant dining, event and party hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, CookieTractor, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection via __RequestVerificationToken cookie
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieTractor
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie descriptions.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. WHOIS data for the domain is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or use of subdomain.
  7. Website uses modern tracking and marketing technologies including Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel.
  8. Website content is focused on hospitality services in Stockholm, Sweden.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and CookieTractor for cookie management. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive and uses HTTPS with secure cookies and anti-CSRF tokens. Performance is moderate with external dependencies on Google and CookieTractor CDNs. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site lacks some security headers and formal privacy and terms pages, indicating areas for technical enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grodan.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grodan.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.