Green Label Service is a Dutch sustainability consultancy specializing in guiding hotels and organizations towards achieving green certifications such as Green Globe and Green Key. Founded in 2018, the company operates within the hospitality sector, offering consultancy and audit services to help clients improve their sustainability performance and obtain recognized green labels. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, targeting hospitality businesses seeking environmental certifications. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, with modern web fonts and cookie consent mechanisms implemented. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie banner present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is functional, well-structured, and trustworthy, though it lacks some compliance documentation and explicit contact details.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
56
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention greenlabelservice.nl, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for greenlabelservice.nl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company occupies a niche market in sustainability consultancy for the hospitality industry, leveraging recognized green certification programs to differentiate its services. Its business model centers on consultancy and audit services, likely generating revenue through project-based engagements with hotels and organizations aiming to improve their environmental footprint. The presence of social media links indicates an active digital marketing approach. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's founding date, supporting legitimacy. The website's content quality and SEO optimization suggest a focus on attracting relevant clients. However, the absence of detailed contact information and compliance documents may limit trust for some visitors. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.
Security posture
The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and DNSSEC, which are strong indicators of secure domain and transport layers. However, the lack of detected security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others suggests potential improvements in hardening the web server against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected in the analyzed content, reducing immediate risk from input-based vulnerabilities, but also limiting user interaction. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be a gap in security transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
Provide explicit contact information including company email and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure performance.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Green Label Service
Description
Uw organisatie verduurzamen? Uw hotel een green label/keurmerk zoals Green Globe en Green Key? Wij begeleiden u naar het beste resultaat!
Key services
Sustainability consultancy, Audits, Guidance for green labels and certifications such as Green Globe and Green Key
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts, CookieYes (cookie consent), jQuery (custom usage)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
DNSSEC enabled
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website uses HTTPS and DNSSEC, indicating good security baseline
No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or metadata
Cookie consent implemented via CookieYes with visible scripts
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
Social media presence on LinkedIn and Instagram confirmed via JSON-LD
Website built on WordPress with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin
No visible forms detected in the provided HTML content
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
No incident response or security contact information found
Content is in Dutch with English alternate language version
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a widely used CMS (WordPress) with the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-friendly infrastructure. Use of Google Fonts and CookieYes for cookie consent shows integration of common web services. The site appears mobile optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic, with standard HTML semantics but no advanced ARIA or accessibility features noted. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized consultancy websites, with opportunities for modernization in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with greenlabelservice.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greenlabelservice.nl.