Skip to main content

Security report for greatlittlecampsites.co.uk

ACSI · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ACSI Great Little Campsites operates as a leading European campsite specialist, focusing on providing a comprehensive selection of small campsites across Europe. The business has a strong market position supported by its long history since 1965 and multiple related brands offering camping discount cards, campsite inspections, and booking services. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and offers a user-friendly experience with clear navigation and search functionalities. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including React, Google Tag Manager, and security tools such as Google reCAPTCHA and New Relic monitoring, ensuring robust performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, script integrity checks, and privacy compliance including GDPR adherence. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website and business demonstrate high professionalism and trustworthiness, suitable for their target audience of campers and travelers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching greatlittlecampsites.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages a multi-brand ecosystem including Eurocampings, CampingCard ACSI, and ACSI Club ID to diversify its offerings and revenue streams. Its business model centers on providing trusted campsite information, annual inspections, and discount cards, targeting camping enthusiasts across Europe. The presence of a webshop and authentication services indicates a mature digital infrastructure supporting e-commerce and user accounts. Partnerships with related domains and use of advanced marketing tools suggest a strategic approach to customer acquisition and retention. The company’s medium size and established history position it well within the hospitality sector, with opportunities for growth through enhanced digital services and expanded campsite listings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse, and script integrity attributes to prevent tampering. Security headers such as X-UA-Compatible and Referrer-Policy are present, though explicit Content Security Policy headers could be improved. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is a minor gap. Overall, the site follows best practices for web security and privacy compliance, supporting user trust and data protection.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a full Content Security Policy header to enhance protection against XSS and code injection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance security headers by adding X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to prevent clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ACSI
Description
ACSI is a leading European campsite specialist since 1965 offering a large selection of small campsites in Europe, with 2035 annually inspected campsites.
Key services
Campsite listings and inspections, Booking services, Camping discount cards, Camping-related products webshop
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Convert Experiences, New Relic monitoring
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • Content Security Policy with script integrity
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login redirects

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied)
Marketing tools
Convert Experiences, Convert-Clarity Integration
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Uses HTTPS with strong security practices.
  3. Includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form available.
  5. Multiple related domains and partner sites linked.
  6. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable due to domain naming rules; no negative impact on trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with React for frontend rendering and integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Convert Experiences, and New Relic for analytics and monitoring. The site is well-optimized for performance with preloading of key assets and fonts, and mobile responsiveness is excellent. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are implemented. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter Card metadata. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, with no common CMS detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, scalable, and aligned with current web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with greatlittlecampsites.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review greatlittlecampsites.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.