Skip to main content

Security report for grawe.at

Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung AG · Finance · Austria

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung AG (GRAWE) is a well-established Austrian insurance company founded in 1828, offering a broad range of insurance products including private, business, and agricultural insurance, alongside financial services. The company maintains a strong market position in Austria with a large customer base and extensive service network. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and multi-language support. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, uses modern JavaScript and CDN services, but suffers from slow load times due to high resource count and page size. Security posture is good with valid SSL, strong cipher suites, and proper DNS security records like SPF and DMARC, though improvements such as enabling HSTS and OCSP stapling are recommended. Privacy compliance is robust with clear cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-aligned policies. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, suitable for its large enterprise status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grawe.at

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
90
Email security
72
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention grawe.at, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
252
Employees
0
Customers
251
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
19%

14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for grawe.at.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GRAWE operates in the finance sector focusing on insurance and related financial services, targeting private individuals, businesses, and agricultural clients primarily in Austria. The company leverages a multi-channel approach including a customer portal and extensive online services. Their marketing and analytics ecosystem includes Google Ads, Facebook, TikTok, and DataReporter, indicating a strong digital marketing strategy. The company’s long history and extensive product portfolio provide competitive advantages. The presence of multiple service portals and social media channels suggests a well-integrated customer engagement model. Growth indicators include a large number of contracts and employees, and a broad geographic presence. Strategic partnerships and internal services are supported by dedicated domains.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced via TLS 1.2 and strong cipher suites. DNS records include valid SPF and a DMARC policy set to quarantine, enhancing email security. No critical SSL vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or FREAK were detected. However, the absence of HSTS and OCSP stapling reduces protection against certain attacks and impacts performance. Session resumption is not enabled, which could affect user experience and security. No explicit security or incident response policies were found on the site. The site uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the security measures are adequate but could be enhanced with additional HTTP security headers and improved SSL configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and protect against downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  3. Enable TLS session resumption via session tickets or cache to enhance performance and security.
  4. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  5. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Grazer Wechselseitige Versicherung AG
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript and uses Amazon Cloudfront as a CDN for hosting static assets. The site includes Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integrations. Despite modern technologies, the site has a slow load time (over 12 seconds) and a large page size (~1MB) with many resources (202), indicating potential for optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). DNS performance is moderate with resolution times around 97ms. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Technical risks include lack of HSTS and OCSP stapling, and no session resumption, which could impact security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grawe.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grawe.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.