Skip to main content

Security report for gravityteam.co

Gravity Team · Finance · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gravity Team is a specialized crypto market making and liquidity provider operating since 2017. They serve a broad range of clients including crypto projects, exchanges, and venture capital firms, offering proprietary quantitative trading software that provides liquidity across over 1,200 crypto-asset pairs on more than 25 exchanges. The company positions itself as a top player in the crypto liquidity market with strong partnerships and a significant trading volume. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, and GSAP for animations, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy and cookie policy and a consent mechanism. Overall, the site reflects a professional and trustworthy business with good digital maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gravityteam.co

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
88
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gravity Team operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on crypto market making and liquidity provision. Their business model revolves around automated trading and liquidity services, targeting crypto exchanges, projects, and investors. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through partnerships with major exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase, and showcases client testimonials that reinforce credibility. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a growing team and significant trading volume. Their marketing and analytics tools support data-driven growth and customer engagement. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is justified given the sensitive nature of crypto trading businesses.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. Cookie consent is implemented in compliance with GDPR, and analytics tools are used responsibly. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. Security headers beyond SSL are not detected, suggesting room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Maintain regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gravity Team
Description
Trading since 2017, we are a top crypto market maker and liquidity provider to over 1,200 crypto-asset pairs across 25+ exchanges.
Key services
Crypto Market Making, Liquidity Provision for Crypto Exchanges
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Flickity Carousel, WordPress, Cookie Law Info Plugin
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited domain statuses
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional crypto market making and liquidity provider website
  2. Strong presence of client testimonials and partner logos
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implementation
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  5. Modern and responsive design with good SEO and accessibility
  6. Use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools
  7. Domain privacy protection used but justified
  8. No direct phone numbers found; contact primarily via email and forms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and GSAP for animations. It uses Flickity for carousels and a cookie consent plugin for privacy compliance. Hosting appears to be via Google Cloud DNS with Google-managed nameservers. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO Premium. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence, though enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers would further strengthen the technical security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gravityteam.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gravityteam.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.