Skip to main content

Security report for grapa.studio

GRAPA Studio s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GRAPA Studio s.r.o. is a Czech-based graphic and digital creative agency specializing in graphic design, postproduction, 3D graphics, web development including e-commerce solutions, and advertising services. Established in 2014 and operating primarily in Pardubice and across the Czech Republic, the company targets businesses seeking professional digital and offline creative solutions. The website reflects a well-structured, professional presence with clear service offerings and client engagement channels. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and Matomo analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and privacy awareness. However, some gaps exist in cookie consent mechanisms and visible security headers, which could be improved to enhance compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, but the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate small business with a consistent brand identity and positive client feedback. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its local market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grapa.studio

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention grapa.studio, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for grapa.studio right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GRAPA Studio operates as a small, service-oriented digital creative agency with a focus on graphic design and web development. Their market positioning is strengthened by over 10 years of experience and positive client reviews, including a perfect Google rating. The business model centers on custom project delivery with a personal approach, targeting SMEs and local businesses in the Czech Republic. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts in graphic design, web development, and advertising production. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with clients and suppliers but no publicly identified subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators include a diversified service portfolio and active client engagement through social media and review platforms. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency to maintain competitive advantage and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled (assumed from URL), presence of CSRF tokens in forms, and use of privacy-conscious Matomo analytics. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, indicating limited formal security governance. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms is a compliance gap under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement standard security headers, publish security policies, and improve cookie consent to enhance compliance and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update SSL/TLS configurations to maintain strong encryption standards.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing a data protection officer contact or privacy contact point.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GRAPA Studio s.r.o.
Description
GRAPA Studio is a graphic and postproduction studio based in Pardubice, Czech Republic, providing graphic design, logo creation, web development including e-shops with SEO optimization, and advertising production. They have been operating since 2014 and serve clients across the Czech Republic.
Key services
Graphic design and postproduction, 3D graphics, Logo and corporate identity design, Websites and e-shops with SEO, Advertising production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Swiper.js, Custom CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token present in form input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating privacy protection or query failure.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels and named contacts.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found, which is a GDPR compliance gap.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of Matomo analytics indicates some privacy-conscious tracking.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Swiper.js for sliders and Matomo for analytics, indicating a focus on user experience and privacy. The HTML structure is well-formed with responsive design elements and meta tags for SEO optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the content. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and cookie management. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grapa.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grapa.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.