Skip to main content

Security report for granitaakmens.lv

Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website granitaakmens.lv represents a small local business specializing in the manufacturing and installation of granite monuments, cemetery borders, and other related cemetery accessories. The content is primarily in Latvian and targets individuals or families seeking memorial and cemetery services. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on craftsmanship and installation within a niche market segment. The website is built on the Tilda platform, leveraging its CMS and hosting infrastructure, with a moderate level of technical sophistication including responsive design and animation features. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating some level of digital marketing maturity. Security posture is basic, with no detected security headers or explicit privacy and cookie policies, which presents compliance and risk gaps. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy assessment, but the site content and structure appear consistent with a legitimate small business. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching granitaakmens.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Granitaakmens.lv operates in the real estate sector niche of cemetery monument services in Latvia. The company appears to have a focused market position serving local customers needing granite memorials and related products. The business leverages a service model with direct customer engagement via phone contacts. The website content is well-aligned with the business purpose, though lacks comprehensive corporate information such as company registration or VAT details. The use of Tilda CMS suggests a cost-effective digital presence strategy. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Tag Manager for tracking, but no affiliate or advertising networks are detected. Strategic observations suggest the company could improve trust and compliance by adding privacy policies and contact transparency.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs and external scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of security best practices such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options headers. No forms were detected that collect sensitive data, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting readiness for security incidents. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no advanced privacy controls are visible. Overall, the security posture is basic and should be improved to reduce risk and enhance compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to meet GDPR and user transparency requirements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including abuse and security email addresses.
  5. Regularly monitor and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Apbedīšanas vietas labiekārtošana. Pieminekļu, kapu apmales, kapu kopiņas un citu atribūtu izgatavošana un uzstādīšana
Key services
Pieminekļu izgatavošana, Kapu apmales izgatavošana, Kapu kopiņas izgatavošana, Pieminekļu uzstādīšana, Gravēšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Tilda platform scripts, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Tilda
Platforms
Tilda CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Tilda platform with custom styling and animations.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to phone numbers; no email addresses or physical addresses found.
  5. No security or incident response policies visible.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking.
  9. Mobile responsive design with good visual quality.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda platform, utilizing its proprietary CMS and hosting services. The technology stack includes jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and loads assets from Tilda's CDN. The design is responsive with mobile optimization and includes animation effects. Performance is moderate, with no explicit performance metrics available. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility markup detected. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data found. The site lacks forms that collect personal data, reducing complexity in data protection. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate for a small business but could be enhanced with improved accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with granitaakmens.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review granitaakmens.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.