Skip to main content

Security report for grands-sites-occitanie.fr

Tourisme en Occitanie · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tourisme en Occitanie is a regional tourism promotion website dedicated to showcasing the key destinations and attractions within the Occitanie region of France. It serves as an official portal providing comprehensive travel information, destination guides, and event promotion to attract tourists. The website targets travelers interested in cultural, outdoor, and leisure activities in the region. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor, with integrations for Google Tag Manager and Matomo Analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile-friendly, and accessible, providing a professional user experience. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and includes several security headers, although the Content-Security-Policy could be more comprehensive. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear cookie consent mechanisms and a detailed privacy policy aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trust slightly, as domain registration details are not publicly available. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile with good security and privacy practices but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grands-sites-occitanie.fr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention grands-sites-occitanie.fr, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for grands-sites-occitanie.fr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as an important regional tourism entity, likely supported by government or regional authorities, focusing on hospitality and tourism sectors. It leverages partnerships with related tourism sites such as www.visit-occitanie.com and uses third-party services for marketing and analytics. The business model centers on information dissemination and regional promotion rather than direct sales. The site’s market position is strong within its niche as an official tourism resource. Growth indicators include multilingual support and integration of modern marketing tools. The partnership ecosystem includes analytics and advertising platforms, enhancing reach and user engagement. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve trust signals by publishing more business and security-related information.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy. The use of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates compliance with data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the partial Content-Security-Policy header and lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page represent areas for improvement. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly visible, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to high, suitable for a public-facing tourism website.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a full and strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance visibility of contact information, including security and privacy contacts, on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize security risks.
  5. Consider publishing domain registration details or clarifying privacy protection to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tourisme en Occitanie
Description
Tourisme en Occitanie promotes tourism in the Occitanie region of France, highlighting key destinations and attractions such as Toulouse, Rocamadour, and the Pic du Midi.
Key services
Tourism information, Destination guides, Event promotion, Travel planning assistance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Lae Cookies Consent
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel, Google Adwords Pixel, Pinterest Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Pinterest Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policy with consent mechanism
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the analyzed page
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising pixels with user consent
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is uncommon for a regional tourism site
  7. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found
  8. Good security headers and HTTPS configuration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics and marketing. The site uses a cookie consent management system compliant with GDPR. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is well-implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are present, enhancing usability. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and incomplete security headers, which should be addressed to maintain operational security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grands-sites-occitanie.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grands-sites-occitanie.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.