Skip to main content

Security report for granat-invest.com

Granat Holding · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Granat Holding is an international multi-disciplinary investment holding company focusing on sectors such as finance, real estate, production, social projects, and development. The company positions itself as a trusted private investor with a presence in multiple countries, targeting investors and business partners interested in diversified investment opportunities. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and good content quality, although some areas like privacy compliance and direct contact information could be improved. Technically, the website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Maps API, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. However, there is a lack of advanced security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. The site uses HTTPS and has a stable domain registration, which supports its legitimacy. From a security perspective, the site has a moderate posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. No incident response or security policies are published, and no direct company contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may impact user trust and compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, improved security practices, and more transparent contact information to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching granat-invest.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Granat Holding operates as a medium-sized international investment holding company with a diversified portfolio across finance, real estate, production, and social projects. The business model focuses on asset management, industry expertise, and long-term development strategies. The company targets investors and partners seeking multi-sector investment opportunities. The website indicates a stable market position with a domain age consistent with the company's founding year (2016). Social media presence on major platforms supports brand visibility. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information on the website limits deeper verification but does not raise immediate concerns. The company emphasizes competitive advantages and asset management expertise, suggesting a focus on professional investment services and business development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection status set to clientTransferProhibited. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No visible incident response or security policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The contact form collects user data but lacks visible security or privacy assurances. There is no cookie consent mechanism, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from implementing recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security and incident response policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  4. Publish clear terms of service and incident response policies including security contact information.
  5. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Granat Holding
Description
GRANAT is an international multi-disciplinary and cross-sectorial holding, with investment focus on development, finance, production, social projects, real estate and management.
Key services
Asset management, Industry expertise, Business development, Social projects, Real estate investment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Maps API, Bootstrap CSS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation
  2. No explicit cookie policy or consent mechanism found
  3. Privacy policy is present but basic and lacks GDPR compliance indicators
  4. No terms of service or security/incident response policies published
  5. Contact information is limited to a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found
  6. Use of Google Maps API with custom styling and multiple location markers
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Skype
  8. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data
  10. Domain registration is consistent and appropriate for business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap CSS framework, and Google Maps API with custom styling and multiple location markers. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate with minified CSS and JS assets. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not evident beyond the registrar information. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but includes basic meta tags and language declarations. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and potential risk areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with granat-invest.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review granat-invest.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.