Skip to main content

Security report for gradient.ai

DeepSky · Finance · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DeepSky is a specialized AI-driven business research platform focused primarily on finance and investment sectors. It offers users the ability to generate detailed investment reports, market analyses, and strategic insights through an AI-powered interface. The platform targets finance professionals, investors, and business strategists seeking consolidated and actionable business intelligence. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, and integrates analytics via PostHog. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization with a professional design and clear navigation. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs standard security headers, and uses content security policies, but lacks a public security policy and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gradient.ai

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DeepSky positions itself as a niche AI-powered research assistant in the finance and investment domain, offering subscription-based services that generate customized reports and analyses. Its business model revolves around SaaS subscriptions with features like unlimited report reads, scheduled tasks, and access to professional data sources such as SEC filings. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2017, with no public parent or subsidiary companies. The platform's content quality and branding are consistent, targeting a professional audience. Social media presence on LinkedIn and X supports its market engagement. The lack of direct contact information and limited public business disclosures suggest a focus on digital-first customer interactions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content Security Policy with nonce values. The use of Cloudflare DNS adds an additional layer of DNS security, although DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms despite analytics usage. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DeepSky
Description
DeepSky is a business superagent platform that consolidates information and provides AI-powered research and report generation focused on finance, investment, market analysis, and strategy.
Key services
Investment report generation, Market and earnings analysis, Industry growth and trend analysis, Management and strategy insights, Investing strategy evaluation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, Axios, PostHog (analytics), JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Content Security Policy with nonce
  • Client-side input controls on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional AI-powered business research platform focused on finance and investment.
  2. Content is rich with multiple example reports and use cases.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on public pages.
  4. Privacy and terms pages are hosted on a subdomain with authentication.
  5. No cookie consent banner detected despite use of analytics.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy publicly available.
  8. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and X (Twitter).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services. It uses Axios for API requests and integrates PostHog for analytics. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and uses Content Security Policy with nonce for script security. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of CSS. Mobile optimization is good, and the site includes basic accessibility features. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or framework-based build. The technical implementation is solid with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gradient.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gradient.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.