Skip to main content

Security report for gracefloor.eu

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website gracefloor.eu serves as a news aggregation platform primarily publishing trending news articles in Turkish with some English content. The site appears to be small-scale with basic content quality and limited business identity. It prominently displays a domain-for-sale banner linking to Sedo, indicating the domain may not be actively used for a mature business. Technically, the site uses Tailwind CSS for styling and Histats for visitor analytics. The site is accessible without any web application firewall or security challenge, but lacks critical security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. No contact or business information is provided, which limits trust and credibility. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with significant room for improvement in security, privacy, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gracefloor.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain gracefloor.eu is registered with Spaceship, Inc. but lacks detailed registrant information. The website functions as a news publishing platform targeting a general audience interested in current events, primarily in Turkish. The business model appears to be content aggregation or publishing, possibly monetized through advertising or domain resale. There is no evidence of a parent company, subsidiaries, or formal business structure. The site’s market position is unclear and likely minimal given the basic content and lack of branding. The partnership ecosystem is limited to external links such as Sedo for domain sales and Bing for images. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not evident from the site content.

Security posture

The website’s security posture is weak. It lacks standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed from the data. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of third-party analytics (Histats) introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy compliance. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The absence of security best practices and transparency increases risk and reduces user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
  4. Ensure HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  5. Remove or clarify the domain-for-sale status to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Fresh and trending updates from gracefloor.eu
Key services
news articles publishing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Histats analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Histats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Histats
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a news aggregation site with articles mostly in Turkish and some English.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  4. No security or incident response policies or contacts found.
  5. Uses Tailwind CSS for styling and Histats for analytics tracking.
  6. Contains external links primarily to Sedo (domain sale) and Bing image sources.
  7. No forms or data collection fields detected on the main page.
  8. No social media links or official company contacts found.
  9. Website is accessible without WAF or security blocks.
  10. Content is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Tailwind CSS loaded from CDN for styling and includes Histats analytics scripts for visitor tracking. The HTML is valid and structured but minimal in terms of interactive elements or dynamic content. Performance is moderate with no obvious heavy resources. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design via Tailwind CSS. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD. No CMS or backend platform is detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site lacks accessibility features beyond basic HTML semantics.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gracefloor.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gracefloor.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.