Skip to main content

Security report for gpspro.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GpsPro.lv is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in sports electronics, outdoor equipment, and automotive products. The website offers a broad range of products including sport watches, sensors, electric scooters, drones, audio-video gaming equipment, and hunting and fishing gear. The target audience is primarily Latvian consumers interested in sports and outdoor activities. The business operates with a basic but functional online presence, leveraging common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for consent management. Technical infrastructure includes jQuery and Slick Carousel libraries, with a focus on mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the website is operational and moderately professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gpspro.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gpspro.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
45
Employees
0
Customers
45
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gpspro.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GpsPro.lv positions itself as a niche retailer in the Latvian market, focusing on sports and outdoor electronics and accessories. The business model is direct online retail, targeting consumers seeking specialized products in fitness, mobility, and outdoor recreation. The use of multiple third-party marketing and tracking services indicates an active digital marketing strategy aimed at customer engagement and retargeting. However, the lack of visible contact information and corporate details may limit customer trust and business credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The company appears to be small in size with a localized market focus. Growth potential exists through improved transparency, enhanced security, and expanded customer support channels.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for mature security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and customer trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including company email, phone number, and physical address on the website.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance security governance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Sporta pulksteņi, sensori un pulsometri, Elektriskie skūteri, velo, skeitbordi, motorolleri, Optiskās ierīces, Droni, Stabilizatori, Audio, Video, Gaming, Auto un Moto preces, Medības, makšķerēšana, tūrisms, Sports,...
Key services
Sale of sport watches, sensors, and heart rate monitors, Electric scooters, bicycles, skateboards, motor scooters, Optical devices, drones, stabilizers, Audio, video, gaming equipment, Automotive and motorcycle products, Hunting, fishing, tourism, and sports equipment
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot Consent Management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Retail Rocket
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads, Retail Rocket
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Retail Rocket
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Retail Rocket
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, along with Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive with viewport meta tags and uses multiple CSS stylesheets for layout and theming. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or backend platform was identified from the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not available. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles used in the cookie consent dialog. SEO is supported by meta description, keywords, and canonical link tags but could be improved with structured data and Open Graph tags, which were not found. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gpspro.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gpspro.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.