Skip to main content

Security report for gpnord.com

GP Nord Ltd · Healthcare · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GP Nord Ltd is a Latvia-based pharmaceutical wholesaler specializing in supplying human and veterinary medicines globally, including unlicensed medicines and clinical trial supplies. The company emphasizes compliance with EU Good Distribution Practice standards and operates a climate-controlled warehouse to ensure product quality. Their market position is that of a reliable regional wholesaler with a growing international footprint, supported by a professional website that highlights their services, certifications, and customer testimonials. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and SEO best practices. The site is mobile-optimized and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with the business location and claims, with no signs of blocking or security challenges. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some HTTP security headers appear absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. Contact information is comprehensive and prominently displayed, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for GP Nord Ltd, with minor technical improvements recommended to enhance security and performance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gpnord.com

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gpnord.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gpnord.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GP Nord operates in the healthcare sector as a pharmaceutical wholesaler, serving a global customer base including pharmacies and healthcare providers. Their business model focuses on consolidating products from various regions for efficient global distribution, including specialized services like unlicensed medicines and clinical trial supplies. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through compliance with EU GDP regulations, a climate-controlled warehouse, and a strong supplier network. Testimonials from industry professionals reinforce their reputation. The company was founded in 2018 and maintains a medium-sized operation with a clear focus on quality and customer service. Their partnership ecosystem includes suppliers and manufacturers, with active social media engagement to support brand visibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be a potential risk for DNS spoofing attacks. The absence of explicit HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicates compliance with privacy regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available, which could be addressed to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced DNS security and HTTP header hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Consider adding explicit incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GP Nord Ltd
Registration number
40203177406
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GP Nord Ltd
Description
EU based healthcare pharmaceutical wholesaler, serving client needs around the globe. Wholesale, Unlicenced medicines, Clinical Trials etc.
Key services
Unlicenced medicines supply, Clinical trial supplies, Wholesale pharmaceutical distribution, Veterinary products supply
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • ClientRenewProhibited domain status
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ClientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured
  2. Clear business focus on pharmaceutical wholesale and clinical trial supplies
  3. Good presence of trust indicators including certifications and testimonials
  4. Comprehensive contact information and social media presence
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No signs of blocking or security challenges
  7. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Elementor for page building. It employs Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and integrates Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager for traffic analysis. The site uses jQuery and other standard JavaScript libraries. Hosting appears to be managed through GoDaddy, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration via Open Graph tags. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a technical gap. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence with opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gpnord.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gpnord.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.