Skip to main content

Security report for gpj.co.uk

George P. Johnson · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GPJ UK is a globally recognized strategic experience marketing agency specializing in live, virtual, and hybrid events. The company positions itself as a leader in delivering immersive brand experiences for major corporate clients across multiple sectors. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, strong branding, and a clear focus on client engagement and case studies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a domain registration error, which limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and affiliations suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible digital asset for the company.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gpj.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gpj.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gpj.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GPJ UK operates in the experiential marketing industry, targeting large corporate clients and global brands. Their business model focuses on B2B service delivery of event management and experience design, leveraging a strong global network under Project Worldwide. The company demonstrates competitive advantages through its long history, extensive client portfolio, and innovative event solutions including sports marketing. Revenue streams likely include event production, digital experience services, and consulting. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple regional GPJ domains and the parent company Project Worldwide, enhancing market reach and operational scale. Strategic observations highlight a focus on innovation, client engagement, and brand consistency, positioning GPJ UK as a market leader in experience marketing.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no public incident response or security policy page, nor a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure, which could enhance transparency and readiness. The use of third-party analytics and tracking tools is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy best practices. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility by including verified company emails and phone numbers for direct communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
George P. Johnson
Description
GPJ UK is a strategic experience marketing agency specializing in live, virtual, and hybrid events, delivering immersive brand experiences for global clients.
Key services
Live events, Virtual events, Hybrid events, Experience design, Sports marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Vimeo Player API, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Lead Forensics, WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes suggest usage)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Lead Forensics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lead Forensics
Marketing tools
Lead Forensics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent design
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain registration error from Nominet UK
  7. Use of multiple global domains for regional presence
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with integration of Yoast SEO for search optimization and jQuery for client-side scripting. It uses Bootstrap framework for responsive design and Vimeo Player API for embedded video content. Analytics are managed via Google Analytics and Lead Forensics, with GDPR-compliant cookie consent implemented through WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO practices. Performance is moderate with potential for improvement through optimization of media assets and script loading. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gpj.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gpj.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.