Skip to main content

Security report for got2pee.com

NameCheap, Inc. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Got2pee.com is a niche adult entertainment website specializing in voyeuristic and fetish-themed videos focused on public and outdoor urination. The site operates primarily on a subscription and pay-per-view business model, targeting an adults-only audience interested in this specific fetish content. The website has been operational since 2014, with domain registration consistent with its business age and no privacy protection on WHOIS data, indicating transparency in domain ownership. Technically, the site uses a custom CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Video.js for video playback. Hosting and DNS services are provided by reputable providers including Cloudflare and NameCheap. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with good navigation and content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching got2pee.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention got2pee.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
233
Employees
0
Customers
233
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
18%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for got2pee.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the adult media sector with a clear focus on voyeuristic fetish content, leveraging subscription and token-based pay-per-view revenue streams. It maintains partnerships with established payment processors such as Segpay and Epoch, enhancing payment reliability and trust. The site has a consistent brand presence and uses social media channels on Facebook and Twitter to engage its audience. While the site lacks direct contact emails or phone numbers, it provides a support ticket system for member assistance. The business appears small but stable, with a focused niche market and a loyal user base.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status on the domain to prevent unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No advanced security headers were detected in the HTML content, and there is no published security policy or incident response information. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and ad networks, which could introduce risks if not regularly audited. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present but no explicit GDPR compliance statements. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better DNS security, security headers, and transparency on security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide direct company contact information for security and abuse reporting to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and ad networks to minimize vulnerability exposure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NameCheap, Inc.
Description
Got2pee.com offers voyeuristic adult video content focused on public and outdoor urination scenarios, capturing candid and fetish-themed videos.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Membership access, Pay-per-view content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Video.js, Google Analytics, Underscore.js, Moment.js
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
PennyNetwork, Azshopp
Marketing tools
PennyNetwork embed
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content platform specializing in voyeuristic peeing videos.
  2. Content is accessible without WAF or blocking.
  3. Uses multiple third-party scripts and ad networks.
  4. Has basic privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; support via ticket system.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  7. Domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar.
  8. No DNSSEC configured, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks including jQuery, Bootstrap, Video.js, and utility libraries like Underscore.js and Moment.js. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but does not use DNSSEC, which is a missed opportunity for enhanced DNS security. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. The site uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking and styling. The CMS appears custom-built, with no popular CMS detected. The site uses multiple embedded scripts from ad and affiliate networks, which may impact load times and security posture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for the site's purpose but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with got2pee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review got2pee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.