Skip to main content

Security report for gopay.com

GoPay s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GoPay s.r.o. operates a professional payment gateway service targeting merchants and e-commerce businesses primarily in the Czech Republic and surrounding European markets. The company offers a comprehensive payment solution with over 80 features including support for Apple Pay, Google Pay, multiple currencies, and localized payment experiences in 19 languages. The website reflects a mature business with over 18,000 merchants and more than 10 years of operational history, positioning GoPay as a trusted player in the payment processing industry. Technically, the website is built with modern web technologies including HTML5 video, JavaScript, and CSS3, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted on Amazon Web Services, indicating a robust infrastructure. The website is mobile optimized, fast loading, and includes cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and PCI DSS certification is prominently displayed, indicating adherence to industry security standards. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contact represents areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, but the lack of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing a security policy, adding security headers, and clarifying domain registration details to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gopay.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GoPay is positioned as a payment gateway service provider with a strong foothold in the Czech and European e-commerce markets. Its competitive advantages include a broad feature set, multi-currency and multi-language support, and integration with popular payment methods like Apple Pay and Google Pay. The business model centers on providing payment processing services to merchants, with revenue likely generated from transaction fees and account services. The company targets small to medium-sized merchants and enterprises seeking seamless payment solutions. Growth indicators include a large merchant base and over a decade of operation. The partnership ecosystem includes well-known brands such as Fortuna, Shoptet, and O2, enhancing market credibility. The company maintains a professional online presence with testimonials and certifications, supporting its market position.

Security posture

GoPay demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and PCI DSS certification, essential for payment processing businesses. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms indicates GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely handling of security events. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the website content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is complete and accurate to improve domain legitimacy trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Continue to monitor and enhance privacy compliance and cookie consent mechanisms to maintain GDPR adherence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GoPay s.r.o.
Description
GoPay payment gateway is a proven solution for merchants of all sizes. No setup fees, transparent pricing, 80+ features, Apple Pay and Google Pay. Fast integration and top-notch support available.
Key services
Payment gateway, Personal account, Demo gateway
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Video HTML5, CSS3, Lazy loading images, CookieConsent.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of PCI DSS standards

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieConsent.js
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong branding and consistent professional design
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact published
  6. Use of modern web technologies and good SEO practices
  7. Presence of trusted certifications such as PCI DSS
  8. Multiple social media and partner links present
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. It employs lazy loading for images and videos to optimize performance. Hosting is on Amazon Web Services, providing scalability and reliability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is fast with multimedia content well integrated. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data which could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gopay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gopay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.