Skip to main content

Security report for goldenwell.cz

Golden Well Hotel · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Golden Well Hotel is a luxury boutique hotel located in central Prague, near Prague Castle. The website presents a professional and visually appealing platform offering detailed information about rooms, suites, dining, facilities, and special offers. The site integrates a booking engine powered by TravelClick, allowing users to make reservations directly. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies, analytics, and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is good with HTTPS and Content Security Policy headers, though additional security headers could enhance protection. The absence of WHOIS data and explicit privacy and security policies slightly reduce trust and compliance confidence. Overall, the website is well-positioned in the hospitality market, targeting luxury travelers seeking premium accommodation in Prague.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goldenwell.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
48
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hotel operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on luxury boutique accommodation. Its market positioning leverages its prime location and heritage building. The business model centers on direct bookings and premium guest services. The website supports English and Czech languages, indicating a focus on both international and local clientele. Integration with TravelClick suggests reliance on established booking platforms. The presence of TripAdvisor widgets and social media tracking indicates active reputation management and marketing efforts. Lack of detailed corporate information and WHOIS transparency suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise without extensive public corporate disclosures.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a Content Security Policy header, which are positive security measures. However, other common security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security are not detected. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The booking form collects standard reservation data securely. Cookie consent is managed via SecurePrivacy, indicating GDPR awareness, though no explicit privacy policy page was found. Incident response and security policies are not publicly available, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. WHOIS data is missing, which impacts domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the website footer or header.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Clarify WHOIS domain registration details or ensure domain registration information is publicly accessible.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure and improving security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Golden Well Hotel
Description
The Golden Well Hotel is a boutique Prague hotel enjoying one of the best locations in the city. The Golden Well Hotel offers an exquisite choice of luxury Prague accommodation with 17 rooms and 2 suites, each reflective of the building's rich heritage, providing our guests with incomparable views, luxury accommodation, exceptional service, and world-class amenities.
Key services
Luxury rooms and suites, Dining facilities, Special offers and packages, Online booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, SecurePrivacy cookie consent, TripAdvisor widget, Select2 (for form selects), Slick Slider (carousel), Web Components (rates-proxy.js)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy header present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • SecurePrivacy cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
SecurePrivacy cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a luxury boutique hotel site with rich content and booking integration
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment
  3. Privacy policy page not found or not linked explicitly
  4. Cookie consent implemented with SecurePrivacy
  5. Multiple tracking and analytics scripts present
  6. No visible security or incident response policies
  7. Website uses HTTPS with CSP header but lacks other common security headers
  8. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and address
  9. Site is well structured with multi-language support (English and Czech)
  10. Booking form collects standard reservation data with no sensitive personal data fields exposed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, SecurePrivacy for cookie consent, and TravelClick CMS and booking engine integration. It employs responsive design with multiple font families loaded from Google Fonts. The booking form uses Select2 for enhanced select inputs and Slick Slider for hero image carousels. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation hints are present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data describing the hotel entity. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities to optimize performance and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goldenwell.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goldenwell.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.