Skip to main content

Security report for gokhulp.be

DVK Systems & Consultancy Bvba · Healthcare · Belgium

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gokhulp.be is a specialized online platform focused on providing information, self-help tools, and professional guidance for individuals affected by gambling problems in Belgium. The website offers a comprehensive range of services including educational content, self-assessment tests, online self-help programs, and moderated forums for community support. It is operated by DVK Systems & Consultancy Bvba and is affiliated with recognized organizations such as CAD-Limburg and the Kansspelcommissie, enhancing its credibility and trustworthiness. From a technical perspective, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Matomo, and accessibility tools like UserWay. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though it appears to be custom-built rather than using a common CMS. Performance is moderate with good navigation and content structure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and obfuscated email addresses to reduce scraping risks. However, the site lacks visible security headers and does not provide explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial; while a privacy policy is present, there is no cookie consent mechanism detected, which is a notable gap given GDPR requirements. Overall, gokhulp.be is a trustworthy and professional resource for gambling addiction support with a mature target audience. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would enhance its risk profile and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gokhulp.be

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gokhulp.be occupies a niche in the healthcare and non-profit sector, focusing on gambling addiction support. Its business model centers on providing free, accessible online self-help and professional guidance services. The platform targets individuals struggling with gambling and their concerned relatives, offering tailored content and community engagement. The website's longevity since 2008 and affiliations with regional health authorities position it as a reputable player in its domain. The presence of sister sites addressing other addictions and mental health issues suggests a broader network and partnership ecosystem. Revenue streams are likely grant or government-funded given the non-commercial nature. Growth indicators include active content updates, interactive tools, and community forums.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and email addresses are obfuscated to prevent harvesting. The use of secure chat for personal help and anonymous forums indicates attention to user privacy. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about tracking.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DVK Systems & Consultancy Bvba
Description
Website providing information and support for gambling problems, including self-help and online guidance.
Key services
Information about gambling and gambling problems, Online self-help programs, Online professional guidance, Self-assessment tests, Community forums
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, UserWay Accessibility Widget, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Tiny Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure chat for personal help
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Email addresses obfuscated in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on gambling addiction support and self-help.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. Email addresses are obfuscated to prevent scraping.
  5. Multiple external trusted domains linked for additional support resources.
  6. Use of modern analytics and accessibility tools.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap-like CSS classes, Tiny Slider for carousels, and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Matomo. Accessibility is enhanced with the UserWay widget. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site appears custom-developed without a common CMS, which may increase maintenance overhead but allows tailored functionality. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of visible security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gokhulp.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gokhulp.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.