Skip to main content

Security report for gofucker.com

GoFucker · Media · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GoFucker.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of HD pornographic videos. Established in 2017, it offers a large catalog of categorized adult content targeting adult viewers seeking free online porn. The business model relies primarily on advertising revenue, leveraging multiple third-party ad networks and tracking services. The website is accessible globally with moderate mobile optimization and basic user experience design. Technically, it uses Cloudflare DNS and lazy loading for images but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, indicating room for security improvements. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, and contact information is minimal, limited to an abuse reporting page, which may impact user trust and compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the site operates with basic technical infrastructure and moderate security posture but lacks comprehensive privacy and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gofucker.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult media sector, offering free pornographic video streaming with daily content updates. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of free content and ease of access without registration. Revenue is generated through advertising partnerships, notably with ExoClick. The extensive network of related and partner adult sites suggests a broad partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of visible business contact details and privacy policies may limit credibility and compliance with evolving regulations. The site targets adult consumers globally, with a focus on the US market as indicated by default country settings. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals and compliance adherence.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection active. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces resilience against common web attacks. The site uses multiple third-party scripts and ad networks, which may introduce vulnerabilities if not regularly audited. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security certifications was found. Incident response is partially addressed via an abuse page, but no dedicated security contact or policy is visible. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent mechanism or privacy policy, exposing potential regulatory risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility, including dedicated security and data protection contacts.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and ad networks to minimize security risks and improve user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GoFucker
Description
Free online porn tube site offering tons of free XXX HD porn videos daily with smooth playback, accessible on mobile and PC.
Key services
Free streaming of HD porn videos, Daily content updates, Categorized video browsing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, LazySizes (lazy loading images)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content streaming platform with extensive free pornographic video content.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
  3. Contact information is minimal; only an abuse page is linked for incident reporting.
  4. Heavy use of third-party ad networks and tracking services.
  5. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. Website uses Cloudflare DNS but no WAF challenge detected.
  7. Content is accessible and not blocked by security mechanisms.
  8. Website design and UX are basic with moderate mobile optimization.
  9. No business contact emails or phone numbers found.
  10. Large number of external links to related adult content sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard HTML5 and JavaScript stack with lazy loading for images to optimize performance. It relies on Cloudflare for DNS services and NameCheap as the registrar. The site loads multiple external scripts for analytics, ads, and social sharing, which may impact performance and security. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data but could be improved. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built or lightly templated. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization by reducing third-party dependencies and improving caching strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gofucker.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gofucker.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.