Skip to main content

Security report for godel.se

GodEl · Energy · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GodEl is a Swedish energy company specializing in providing renewable electricity contracts without hidden fees or binding periods. The company positions itself as a socially responsible supplier, donating all profits to charity and emphasizing sustainability. Their offerings include fixed and hourly electricity pricing, a mobile app for consumption monitoring, and smart heating solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as WordPress CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and analytics tools including Google Analytics and Hotjar. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and bot protection via reCAPTCHA, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive cookie consent and a detailed privacy policy. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy, supporting GodEl's market position as a reputable energy provider in Sweden.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching godel.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GodEl operates in the Swedish energy sector targeting both private and business customers. Their competitive advantage lies in transparent pricing, renewable energy certification (Bra Miljöval), and a charitable business model donating profits to various causes. The company has a medium-sized footprint with a domain age consistent with its 2005 founding. Their digital ecosystem includes dedicated portals for customer service, account management, and signups, indicating a well-structured customer journey. Marketing and analytics integrations suggest active engagement in customer insights and targeted advertising. The absence of explicit terms of service and security policies online may be areas for future enhancement. Partnerships with recognized charities and sustainability certifications strengthen their brand and trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA integration to mitigate bot traffic. Cookie consent is granular and compliant with GDPR requirements. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement for DNS integrity. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected and should be reviewed for implementation. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and explicitly configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Review and publish terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GodEl
Description
Elavtal utan dolda avgifter, bindningstider eller uppsägningstider. Timprisavtal eller rörligt och all vinst till välgörenhet.
Key services
Electricity contracts (fixed, variable, hourly pricing), Mobile app for electricity monitoring, Smart heating solutions, Sustainability and charity partnerships
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Plausible Analytics, Ebbot Chatbot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent with granular control
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Quantcast, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising, Google AdSense, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Quantcast, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained
  2. Strong focus on renewable energy and charity
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance
  4. No visible security or content blocking issues
  5. Use of modern analytics and marketing tools with transparency
  6. Contact information clearly provided with multiple channels
  7. No explicit terms of service found on main site
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrations with Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, and Plausible Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts and analytics tools. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) and comprehensive meta tags supports strong SEO. Hosting and DNS are managed via Swedish providers consistent with the business location. The technical infrastructure is stable and modern, though some optimization opportunities exist in security headers and DNS configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with godel.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review godel.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.