Skip to main content

Security report for gnosispay.com

Gnosis Pay · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gnosis Pay is a recently founded company (2023) operating in the decentralized finance (DeFi) payments sector, aiming to bridge traditional finance (TradFi) and DeFi through a decentralized payments network. The website presents a basic but consistent branding and design, targeting users and businesses interested in fintech and blockchain payment solutions. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Framer for CMS, Google Tag Manager, and PostHog for analytics, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide contact information, which impacts its compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with no detected WAF or blocking mechanisms, but missing security headers and DNSSEC are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gnosispay.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gnosis Pay positions itself as a fintech innovator in the payments space, focusing on interoperability between traditional and decentralized finance systems. The business model revolves around providing a decentralized payments network, likely monetizing through transaction fees or partnerships. The target market includes fintech companies, blockchain users, and enterprises seeking DeFi integration. The company is small-sized and newly established, with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website content is basic, indicating an early-stage digital presence. No explicit trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials are present, suggesting room for growth in market credibility and partnership ecosystem development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms further impacts privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires significant improvements in policy publication, header implementation, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and ensure secure handling of user data to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gnosis Pay
Description
Gnosis Pay is a decentralized payments network that removes the barriers between TradFi and DeFi.
Key services
Decentralized payments network, Bridging TradFi and DeFi payments
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, PostHog analytics, Framer
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the visible content.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools but lacks visible security headers and compliance documentation.
  5. WHOIS data shows domain is recently registered with standard protection statuses but no DNSSEC enabled.
  6. Content is focused on decentralized finance payment solutions bridging traditional and decentralized finance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and PostHog. Hosting appears to be via Amazon Registrar's DNS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO with proper meta tags and responsive design. However, no advanced accessibility features or performance optimizations beyond basic levels are evident. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. The site lacks structured data beyond Open Graph metadata, limiting rich search engine results. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sound but can benefit from enhanced security configurations and richer SEO and accessibility implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gnosispay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gnosispay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.