Skip to main content

Security report for gnomehk.cz

Martin Pekárek · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gnomehk.cz represents a small local construction service provider operated by Martin Pekárek, specializing in preparatory and finishing construction works such as demolition, earthworks, material transport, and surface reinforcement. The business targets clients primarily in Hradec Králové and surrounding areas, offering a range of construction-related services with a professional online presence. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern technologies including Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Maps API to enhance user experience and security. From a technical perspective, the site uses the Nette Framework and several JavaScript libraries to deliver a responsive and interactive experience. The presence of HTTPS and reCAPTCHA on the contact form indicates a baseline security posture. However, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies highlights areas for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness but does not directly impact the operational legitimacy of the business as presented. Security-wise, the site shows good practices such as encrypted connections and spam protection but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The overall risk is moderate, with recommendations to enhance privacy compliance, implement security headers, and provide transparency on data protection. The business credibility is supported by clear contact information and professional content, though the lack of WHOIS transparency is a concern. Strategically, the company should focus on improving privacy and security disclosures to build greater trust with users and comply with GDPR requirements. Enhancing technical security measures and publishing incident response information would further strengthen the security posture and business reputation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gnomehk.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gnomehk.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gnomehk.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gnome HK operates as a small, local construction service provider with a focus on preparatory and finishing works. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized equipment and environmentally conscious demolition practices. The business model is service-oriented, targeting residential and commercial clients in a defined geographic area. Revenue streams likely come from contracted construction projects and ancillary services such as material transport and site preparation. The company maintains a professional website with clear contact channels but lacks broader digital marketing or social media presence. Growth indicators are not explicit, and no partnerships beyond the website developer (PSHK s.r.o.) are evident. The company appears to operate independently without subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting the contact form from spam. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, HSTS) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, as a GDPR consent checkbox is present on the contact form but no privacy or cookie policies are published. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are minimal. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with better transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to improve security transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Martin Pekárek
Registration number
05477981
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Martin Pekárek
Description
Specialist in preparatory and finishing construction works including site preparation, demolition, earthworks, material transport, and surface reinforcement.
Key services
Demolition, Earthworks, Material transport, Surface reinforcement, Additional construction services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Maps API, jQuery, GSAP TweenMax, Nette Framework (netteForms, nette.ajax)
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, physical address, and contact form with GDPR consent checkbox.
  4. Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form enhances security against spam.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  6. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  7. No social media links found on the site.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  9. No explicit security policies or incident response information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Nette Framework with JavaScript libraries including jQuery, GSAP TweenMax, and Google APIs for analytics, maps, and reCAPTCHA. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of external scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. SEO is supported by appropriate meta descriptions and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but present. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of documented security policies, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks or compliance issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gnomehk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gnomehk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.