Skip to main content

Security report for gmbill.com

GMBill.com BV · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GMBill.com BV operates a specialized online platform focused on providing merchant accounts and credit card processing services primarily for online merchants in the US and EU markets. The company also supports affiliate marketing management and subscription access control, positioning itself as a niche service provider in the payment processing and e-commerce space. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and technical infrastructure. The presence of GDPR compliance mechanisms and cookie consent banners reflects awareness of privacy regulations. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA integrated, though the absence of explicit security headers suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and trustworthy, with no signs of malicious or adult content. However, the lack of WHOIS data for the subdomain is typical and does not detract from the legitimacy of the parent domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmbill.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GMBill.com BV targets online merchants requiring merchant accounts and payment processing solutions, with additional services for affiliates and customers managing subscriptions. The business model revolves around facilitating payment acceptance and affiliate commission tracking, generating revenue through merchant fees and affiliate program management. The company appears to have a small but focused market presence, leveraging partnerships and a dedicated portal for different user groups. The website content and structure suggest a stable operation with clear service offerings and customer support channels via contact forms. The absence of direct phone or email contacts on the homepage may indicate a preference for controlled communication channels. The company’s use of GDPR compliance tools and privacy policies aligns with regulatory expectations in their operating regions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. GDPR cookie compliance is actively managed through a consent banner and detailed cookie settings modal, enhancing privacy protections. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a notable gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding direct verified contact information such as support emails or phone numbers to improve trust and accessibility.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience across devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GMBill.com BV
Description
GMBill assists online merchants to obtain merchant accounts and credit card processing services. It also provides affiliate marketing management and access management for subscription or paysites.
Key services
Merchant account application assistance, Credit card processing, Affiliate marketing management, Subscription access management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v3, GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • GDPR cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based portal for payment processing and affiliate marketing services.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation for merchants, customers, and affiliates.
  3. GDPR compliance is actively implemented with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact is via forms.
  5. No security headers detected in the HTML source; recommend adding for improved security.
  6. No WHOIS data for the subdomain; likely a subdomain of a legitimate parent domain.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with common plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Contact Form 7 for form management, and GDPR Cookie Compliance for privacy regulation adherence. The use of jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA indicates standard web technologies for interactivity and security. The site loads external scripts from trusted domains including Google and browser-update.org. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking or errors. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is properly configured with Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and website. The absence of hosting provider information limits deeper infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for security header enhancements and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmbill.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmbill.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.