Skip to main content

Security report for gmbgraphic.com

GUILLAUME MB · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gmbgraphic.com represents a professional graphic designer named Guillaume MB, specializing in title sequences, poster design, branding, and art direction primarily for music videos, short films, and visual projects. The site showcases a portfolio of creative works and emphasizes collaboration with artists and filmmakers to deliver impactful visual storytelling. The business model is freelance and commission-based, targeting creative professionals and artists. Technically, the site is built on Webflow CMS, uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Video.js, and is hosted likely on Webflow's platform. The site is mobile optimized with good design quality and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the site. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmbgraphic.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-scale freelance graphic design service focusing on niche markets such as music videos and film title sequences. The portfolio demonstrates a strong creative focus with a consistent brand identity. The target customers are artists, filmmakers, and musicians seeking specialized graphic design and branding services. The site integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating some level of marketing and user behavior tracking. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business appears to be independent with no parent company. Growth indicators include recent projects dated up to 2025, suggesting ongoing activity. The lack of formal business registration data and WHOIS information limits full business intelligence assessment.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields are present, minimizing attack surface. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and similar regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no known vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, privacy documentation, and formal vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish security contact information.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Improve SEO and accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GUILLAUME MB
Description
Graphic designer specializing in title sequences, poster design, branding, and art direction, focusing on music videos, short films, and visual projects. Expertise includes typography, motion design, and art direction with a focus on collaboration with artists and filmmakers to create impactful and visually compelling designs. Also experienced in branding for artists, musicians, and creative projects, including logos and cohesive visual identities.
Key services
Title sequence design, Poster design, Branding, Art direction, Logo design, Visual identity development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, Video.js 8.16.1, Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional portfolio for a graphic designer named Guillaume MB.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information includes a professional email and social media links.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  5. Uses Webflow CMS and hosting with modern JavaScript libraries.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content.
  9. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered according to raw WHOIS output.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with libraries such as jQuery and Video.js for video playback. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Hosting appears to be on Webflow's infrastructure, providing reliable uptime and performance. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO optimization. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks advanced security headers and formal compliance documentation, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmbgraphic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmbgraphic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.