Skip to main content

Security report for glueckspost.ch

Ringier Axel Springer Schweiz AG · Media · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GlücksPost is a Swiss women’s magazine focused on celebrity and entertainment news, operated by Ringier Axel Springer Schweiz AG. The website serves as a digital platform for the magazine, offering articles, multimedia content, subscription services, and advertising opportunities. It targets a general adult audience interested in lifestyle and entertainment. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates social media channels to enhance user engagement. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and SEO tools, ensuring good performance and search visibility. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Overall, GlücksPost presents a trustworthy and mature digital media presence with clear business legitimacy and operational transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glueckspost.ch

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions GlücksPost as a key player in the Swiss media landscape under the umbrella of Ringier Axel Springer Schweiz AG. Its business model relies on content publishing, advertising revenue, and subscriptions. The presence of multiple advertising networks and tracking technologies indicates a monetization strategy focused on targeted advertising. The company leverages partnerships with Ringier’s advertising network and customer service portals to support operations. The content is regularly updated, reflecting an active editorial team and engagement with current events in entertainment. The brand maintains consistent messaging and visual identity, reinforcing market trust. No suspicious or anomalous business practices were detected.

Security posture

GlücksPost demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available, representing an area for improvement. The use of third-party scripts is extensive but appears managed with consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure for users and business operations, with recommendations to formalize security policies and disclosure practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and user protections.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising tags to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ringier Axel Springer Schweiz AG
Description
Die Frauenzeitschrift für Prominenz und Unterhaltung
Key services
Online magazine content, Print magazine subscription, Advertising services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Prebid.js, Google Publisher Tags, Facebook SDK, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Tealium
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Yieldlove, Google Ad Manager, Ringier Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Tealium (utag.js), OneTrust Cookie Consent
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Gravity Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained media publication
  2. Content is rich and regularly updated with articles and multimedia
  3. Strong compliance with privacy and cookie regulations
  4. Use of multiple advertising and tracking technologies with consent
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Good integration of social media and user engagement features
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Gravity Forms for form handling, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and Prebid.js for header bidding advertising. It integrates multiple ad networks and tracking services such as Google Publisher Tags, Facebook SDK, and Tealium for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and lazy loading images for performance. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and caching. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glueckspost.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glueckspost.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.