Skip to main content

Security report for globalcapital.com.mt

LifeStar Insurance plc · Finance · Malta

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LifeStar Insurance plc is a Malta-registered financial services company specializing in life and health insurance products. The company offers a range of services including life insurance, health insurance, retirement plans, savings, and protection plans, targeting individuals and families primarily in Malta and Italy. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and social media presence, reinforcing its market position as an established insurance provider authorized by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA). The business model focuses on providing peace of mind through comprehensive insurance solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching globalcapital.com.mt

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention globalcapital.com.mt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for globalcapital.com.mt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company maintains a solid market position in the Maltese insurance sector with a medium-sized operational scale. Its partnership with Bupa for health insurance products and a professional website design agency indicates a strategic approach to service diversification and brand presentation. The business model is client-centric, emphasizing product variety and customer support through accessible contact channels and online consultation forms. The presence of GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies reflects adherence to regulatory requirements, enhancing customer trust and compliance posture.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam and abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the web application against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate to good, with recommendations to implement additional HTTP security headers and maintain regular updates of WordPress and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to identify and remediate potential plugin or CMS weaknesses.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain GDPR compliance by regularly reviewing privacy and cookie policies and ensuring clear user consent mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LifeStar Insurance plc
Registration number
C29086
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LifeStar Insurance plc
Description
LifeStar Holding plc (the Group) is a financial services company registered in Malta deriving its core business from the provision of life and health insurance products.
Key services
Life Insurance, Health Insurance, Retirement Plans, Savings and Investments, Protection Plans
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Revolution Slider, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Mailchimp for WordPress, Contact Form 7, MonsterInsights, jQuery, Swiper Slider, Magnific Popup
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Fullworks Anti-Spam)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, MonsterInsights (plugin)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp for WordPress
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based insurance company site with comprehensive product offerings.
  2. Clear contact information and social media presence enhance trust.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices observed.
  4. Security posture is good but can be improved with additional HTTP headers.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder, Revolution Slider, Contact Form 7, and Mailchimp integration for newsletters. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and the site uses modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence with opportunities for performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with globalcapital.com.mt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review globalcapital.com.mt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.