Skip to main content

Security report for glazok.org

Danesco Trading Ltd. · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glazok.org is a Russian-language online platform specializing in monitoring currency exchange points, providing users with comprehensive exchange rate comparisons, user reviews, and alerts for favorable rates. Established in 2015 and operated by Danesco Trading Ltd., the site serves a medium-sized audience interested in electronic currency and cryptocurrency exchanges. The platform leverages WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins and popular JavaScript libraries to deliver a user-friendly and content-rich experience. The website is well-branded and consistent, offering a broad range of currency pairs and exchange services, including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Technically, the site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, and integrates analytics services such as Yandex Metrika and Mail.ru. However, it lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond basic terms of service are found, and contact is primarily via web forms without direct email or phone contacts. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture and good business credibility but should enhance privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glazok.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glazok.org occupies a strong position in the Russian-speaking currency exchange monitoring market, offering one of the largest databases of exchangers and currency pairs. Its business model is based on providing free, real-time exchange rate comparisons and user-generated reviews, monetized likely through affiliate partnerships such as premiumexchanger.com. The platform targets individual users and traders seeking optimal exchange rates for electronic and cryptocurrency transactions. The site’s longevity since 2015 and consistent domain registration indicate stability. The partnership ecosystem includes social media presence on VKontakte and affiliate advertising. Growth indicators include frequent content updates, including finance news and exchange rate data. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand compliance and security features to enhance user trust and regulatory alignment.

Security posture

The website maintains a basic but adequate security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, it lacks several modern security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy, which could mitigate risks like cross-site scripting and clickjacking. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicators represents a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Incident response contacts are not publicly available, which could delay response to security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be significantly improved by adopting recommended headers, policies, and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  2. Add advanced security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure process to improve security transparency and incident response.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  5. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data protection practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Description
Мониторинг обменных пунктов. Обмен валют в любых направлениях. Только лучшие курсы обмена.
Key services
Currency exchanger monitoring, Exchange rate comparison, User reviews and ratings, Alerts for favorable exchange rates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap CSS, FontAwesome, Select2, Toastr, MetisMenu, Animate.css, Blueimp Gallery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS servers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Mail.ru
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
premiumexchanger.com (affiliate banner)
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Mail.ru
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrika, Mail.ru analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive currency exchanger monitoring platform targeting Russian-speaking users.
  2. Content is rich with exchange rates, currency pairs, and user reviews.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with multiple plugins and standard JS libraries.
  6. No phone numbers or emails explicitly found in the content; contact is via web form.
  7. Social media presence limited to VKontakte link.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing a range of popular front-end libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Select2 for UI components. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS, which provides DNS-level protection and performance benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated libraries and improved security configurations. Accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glazok.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glazok.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.