Skip to main content

Security report for gjgridassia.lv

GJ grīdas SIA · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GJ grīdas SIA is a Latvian small business specializing in wooden flooring restoration, sanding, treatment, and rental of related tools. The company also engages in the production and construction of wooden frame, panel, block, and modular houses. The website content is primarily in Latvian and targets both individual and corporate customers within Latvia. The business emphasizes quality materials, timely project completion, and has over 15 years of experience, positioning itself as a reliable local service provider. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile optimized and has a good SEO foundation but lacks some accessibility features. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism but lacks important security headers and formal privacy or terms of service documentation. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gjgridassia.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate and construction sector, focusing on flooring services and wooden house construction. Its business model combines B2C and B2B services, including tool rental and material sales. The partnership with Swedbank suggests financial credibility. The website content and service offerings indicate a niche local market focus with a competitive advantage in experience and quality. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. Marketing tools like Engaga and Google Analytics are used for customer engagement and analytics. The company appears to have a stable operational base but could benefit from enhanced digital presence and compliance documentation to support growth and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner implemented, indicating awareness of basic security and privacy requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the lack of a privacy policy and incident response information indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The use of third-party scripts and marketing tools introduces potential privacy concerns that are not fully addressed. Overall, the security maturity is basic and should be improved to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GJ grīdas SIA
Description
Koka, parketa grīdas atjaunošna, lakošana, eļļošana, labošana. Instrumentu noma, smilšpapīru, lakas un eļļas tirzniecība. Ražošana un piegāde kvalitatīvu koka karkasa, paneļu, bloku, moduļu māju un citu būvju projektēšanā, izgatavošanā un būvniecībā.
Key services
Parketa un dēļu grīdas restaurācija, Grīdas slīpēšana un apstrāde, Instrumentu noma grīdas slīpēšanai, Koka karkasa, paneļu, bloku, moduļu māju ražošana un būvniecība
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, fancybox3, bannerplay, responsivevideos, Mozello CMS, Cloudfront CDN, Google Analytics
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional.
  5. Contact information limited to phone number only; no email or physical address found.
  6. No security.txt or incident response information present.
  7. Website uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN.
  8. Google Analytics and Engaga marketing tools are used.
  9. No social media links detected.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Mozello CMS, utilizing jQuery 2.2.4 and several JavaScript libraries for UI components such as fancybox3 and bannerplay. Content is delivered via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which supports performance and availability. Google Analytics and Engaga marketing tools are integrated for analytics and user engagement. The site is mobile responsive with a clear navigation structure and good SEO metadata. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy documentation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security best practices. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gjgridassia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gjgridassia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.