Skip to main content

Security report for gizatech.xyz

GIZATECH AG · Finance · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Giza, operated by GIZATECH AG, is a technology company focused on providing infrastructure for autonomous financial markets through non-custodial algorithmic agents that execute sophisticated DeFi strategies. The company targets retail and institutional DeFi users as well as protocol partners, positioning itself as an emerging player in the decentralized finance ecosystem. Their flagship product, ARMA, exemplifies their approach to automated stablecoin yield generation. Technically, the website is built using Framer, featuring modern design and moderate performance with good mobile optimization. The site integrates Markfi analytics but lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and script integrity but could be improved with additional headers and incident response contacts. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business identity, supporting legitimacy. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gizatech.xyz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Giza operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on decentralized finance automation via autonomous agents. Their business model revolves around enabling users to deploy and manage algorithmic DeFi strategies without technical expertise. The company leverages partnerships with related domains such as arma.xyz and maintains an active presence on social media platforms including Discord, Telegram, and Twitter. The website content and structure indicate a small but professional organization based in Switzerland. Growth indicators include active blog updates and documentation availability. The company emphasizes user-centric markets and aims to unlock significant liquidity through programmable intelligence. Competitive advantages include continuous market optimization and non-custodial automation. The partnership ecosystem and technical infrastructure suggest a forward-looking approach to DeFi innovation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of script integrity attributes. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended best practices. No forms or input fields are present, reducing attack surface, but no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt is published, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. Incident response contacts are not provided, which could delay handling of security issues. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting standard headers, publishing policies, and providing clear security contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer if applicable.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GIZATECH AG
Description
Giza is the infrastructure powering autonomous financial markets by enabling non-custodial algorithmic agents that execute sophisticated DeFi strategies around the clock. It aims to streamline blockchain complexity through autonomous agents and enable user-centric decentralized finance.
Key services
Autonomous financial agents, DeFi strategy execution, Non-custodial automation, Protocol liquidity management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website builder), p5.js (canvas animation), Markfi analytics script
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of integrity attribute on analytics script

Analytics and tracking

Services
Markfi analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Markfi analytics
Marketing tools
Markfi analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed using Framer with modern UI/UX
  2. Focus on autonomous DeFi agents and financial automation
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  5. Social media presence includes Discord, Telegram, Twitter
  6. Use of external analytics script without visible consent mechanism
  7. No visible forms or data collection fields on main page
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  10. Content is finance and technology focused, safe for general audience
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern web technologies including p5.js for canvas animations and Markfi for analytics. Hosting is via Framerusercontent.com, indicating managed hosting with good uptime and performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. No CMS beyond Framer is detected. The use of external analytics without visible consent mechanisms poses privacy risks. The technical infrastructure is modern but would benefit from improved security configurations and compliance features to reduce risk and improve trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gizatech.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gizatech.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.