Skip to main content

Security report for gironafc.cat

Girona FC · Media · Spain

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Girona FC operates an official website serving as the primary digital presence for the professional football club based in Spain. The site offers comprehensive club-related content including news, match schedules, ticket sales, and merchandising. It targets football fans and supporters, positioning itself as a key platform for engagement and commerce related to the club. Technically, the website leverages modern web frameworks such as Next.js and React, integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, and employs OneTrust for cookie consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers in place, though the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages and missing WHOIS data slightly reduce trust. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and user-friendly, but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gironafc.cat

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Girona FC is positioned as a professional football club competing in LaLiga EA SPORTS, with a medium-sized digital footprint. The business model focuses on fan engagement through content, ticket sales, and merchandising. The website links to official social media channels and partners such as ticketing platforms and sponsors, indicating a well-established partnership ecosystem. The lack of visible company contact details and privacy documentation suggests areas for operational improvement. The club's digital presence supports its market position by providing timely updates and commerce capabilities, targeting sports enthusiasts primarily in Spain.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and multiple security headers implemented, reducing risks of common web attacks. Cookie consent is actively managed, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, and security incident contact information represents compliance gaps. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact site security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  3. Consider registering and publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide justification for privacy protection to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Girona FC
Description
Official website of Girona FC, a professional football club. Provides news, match information, ticket sales, and club-related content.
Key services
News updates, Match schedules and results, Ticket sales, Merchandising store
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in main HTML content.
  5. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  9. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Analytics enables detailed user behavior tracking. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the site loads quickly with no blocking WAF detected. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels are present, supporting inclusive design. Opportunities exist to enhance technical SEO by adding more comprehensive metadata and improving documentation of compliance and security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gironafc.cat. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gironafc.cat.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.