Skip to main content

Security report for girasole-energies.com

GIRASOLE ENERGIES - Producteur indépendant d'électricité photovoltaïque · Energy · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GIRASOLE ENERGIES is an independent photovoltaic electricity producer operating primarily in France, offering a range of solar energy solutions including rooftop installations, parking canopies, agricultural hangars, and ground-mounted solar power plants. The company targets diverse audiences such as farmers, local communities, industrial and tertiary sectors, and real estate developers. Founded in 2022, GIRASOLE ENERGIES positions itself as a key player in the renewable energy transition with a growing portfolio of projects and developments. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Divi popup plugins, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is hosted under the registrar IONOS SE with standard domain protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing some best practices. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and informative but would benefit from improved privacy and security practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching girasole-energies.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector focusing on photovoltaic solar solutions, serving a medium-sized market with a clear business model centered on independent electricity production and turnkey solar projects. The website content and structured data indicate a well-defined target audience and a comprehensive service offering. The presence of social media and marketing tools suggests active customer engagement and lead generation efforts. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the company's founding date, supporting legitimacy. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to be growing with a significant number of projects under development, indicating positive market momentum.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain status protections to prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a security gap. Multiple third-party scripts increase the attack surface and require regular auditing. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is insufficient, lacking GDPR indicators and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and reduce attack surface.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GIRASOLE ENERGIES - Producteur indépendant d'électricité photovoltaïque
Description
Producteur indépendant d'électricité photovoltaïque déployant partout en France des solutions photovoltaïques pour toiture, ombrières parking, hangar, centrale au sol.
Key services
Photovoltaic solutions for roofs, Parking canopies (ombrières), Agricultural hangars, Ground-mounted solar power plants, Turnkey building projects, Roof leasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Divi Popup, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Elementor, Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear focus on photovoltaic energy solutions.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are used without visible consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content provided.
  5. WHOIS data shows domain is relatively new but consistent with business claims.
  6. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data, which is a security best practice gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Divi popup plugins, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools. The hosting and domain registration are managed by reputable providers. Performance is moderate with some lazy loading and caching mechanisms implied. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. The technical stack is standard for a professional business website but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with girasole-energies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review girasole-energies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.