Skip to main content

Security report for gingerpatch.com

Teamskeet · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teamskeet operates a professional adult entertainment website specializing in redhead-themed pornographic video content under the Gingerpatch series. The platform offers subscription-based access to exclusive adult videos featuring various performers. The website is well-branded and uses modern web technologies including React and multiple analytics and marketing tools. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which may indicate privacy protection or registration issues, slightly impacting trustworthiness. The site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security headers are not detected, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the site is functional, content-rich, and targets an adult audience with explicit content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gingerpatch.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gingerpatch.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gingerpatch.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teamskeet holds a strong market position in the adult entertainment industry with a niche focus on redhead performers. The business model revolves around premium subscription access to exclusive video content. The site integrates with affiliate and advertising networks to monetize traffic. The target audience is adults seeking specialized adult content. The company leverages multiple third-party marketing and analytics services to optimize user engagement and conversions. However, the lack of visible compliance documentation and WHOIS transparency may pose risks in regulatory environments.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, indicating basic encryption for data in transit. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The extensive use of third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires vigilant management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Improve accessibility features and ensure compliance with web accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teamskeet
Description
The Gingerpatch Series features the most beautiful redhead teens doing everything you've fantasized about. We capture all the hottest redheaded pornstars doing all the naughty things you wish they'd do to you. You'll find videos featuring Arietta Adams, Alexa Nova, Aria Carson, Annabel Redd, and many more. It's the best redheaded and ginger pornstar video series that you'll ever come across. Oh, and to answer your question...yes, the curtains match the drapes!
Key services
adult video streaming, premium membership access, exclusive adult series content
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Convertexperiments
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
psmads.psmcode.com
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Convertexperiments
Marketing tools
Convertexperiments
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional adult entertainment platform specializing in redhead-themed content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the content.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Convertexperiments. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate, with preloading of CSS and preconnect hints to improve loading times. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. The site could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved privacy compliance mechanisms. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance of third-party integrations is essential to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gingerpatch.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gingerpatch.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.