Skip to main content

Security report for ginekologijasklinika.lv

SIA “Dr.R.Mačuks„ · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dr. Mačuka Operatīvās ginekoloģijas klīnika is a specialized healthcare provider in Latvia focusing on gynecological surgical treatments and oncogynecology. The clinic offers consultations, surgeries, ultrasonography, and breast health services, staffed by experienced specialists. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information and patient testimonials, positioning it as a trusted small healthcare entity in the Latvian market. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking, and is built on the KPanel CMS platform. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with good performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and secure forms, though additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is basic with visible cookie and privacy policies, but lacks detailed security or incident response disclosures. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and credible for its healthcare audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ginekologijasklinika.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector, targeting patients needing gynecological and oncological care. Its business model is service-based, focusing on specialized surgical and diagnostic procedures. The clinic leverages its 10+ years of oncogynecology experience and 25 years in breast cancer treatment to establish market credibility. The website supports patient engagement through multilingual content, contact forms, and testimonials, enhancing trust and accessibility. Partnerships with local design firms and use of popular analytics tools indicate a moderate digital maturity. The absence of WHOIS data limits external validation but internal content suggests a legitimate operation. Growth potential lies in expanding digital presence and enhancing security and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure contact forms. Tracking scripts from Google and Facebook are present, indicating moderate user data collection. However, the site lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and XSS. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Incident response and security policy disclosures are absent, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small healthcare provider but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish detailed security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing clear data retention policies and user rights information aligned with GDPR.
  5. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with standards and better user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Dr.R.Mačuks„
Registration number
0100-01616
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Dr.R.Mačuks„
Description
Dr. Mačuka Operatīvās ginekoloģijas klīnika ir specializēta ārstniecības iestāde tieši ginekoloģijas ķirurģisko manipulāciju veikšanai. Klīnikā konsultē augsti kvalificēti ginekologi, mamologi un abdominālie ķirurgi ar plašu pieredzi labdabīgu un ļaundabīgu saslimšanu ārstēšanā.
Key services
Gynecological consultations, Gynecological surgeries, Ultrasonography, Oncogynecology treatments, Breast health services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, FontAwesome
Frameworks
KPanel CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact forms with POST method
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address provided.
  3. Multiple language options available (Latvian, English, Russian).
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy documents beyond basic privacy and cookie policies.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain legitimacy verification.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content; content is healthcare focused.
  8. No terms of service or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the KPanel CMS platform with a tech stack comprising HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, FontAwesome icons, and integration of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization and clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no significant technical debt or errors detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses embedded Google Maps for location display and includes multiple language options. Opportunities exist to modernize security headers and enhance accessibility compliance to reduce technical risks and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ginekologijasklinika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ginekologijasklinika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.