Skip to main content

Security report for gih.de

GIH Bundesverband · Energy · Germany

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GIH Bundesverband is the largest German association representing energy consultants, focusing on political advocacy, professional training, networking, funding support, and professional representation. The website is built on WordPress with standard SEO optimizations and a professional design targeted at energy professionals in Germany. The technical infrastructure is moderate with hosting provided by Alfahosting. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information. No blocking or WAF mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the site is functional and professional but lacks critical compliance and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gih.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GIH Bundesverband holds a strong market position as the largest energy consulting association in Germany, serving energy consultants and related professionals. Their business model is membership-based, providing advocacy, education, and networking services. The website content and metadata emphasize their role in politics, training, and funding. The organization appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a clear target audience. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There are no detected security headers, no explicit privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of these elements poses compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices reduces trust. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible. The site should improve security documentation and technical controls to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, including a security.txt file.
  4. Include clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers for trust and compliance.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities and improve SSL/TLS configuration.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GIH Bundesverband
Description
GIH – Größter deutscher Verband für Energieberatung – stark in Politik, Weiterbildung, Netzwerk, Förderung und beruflicher Vertretung.
Key services
Political advocacy, Professional training, Networking, Funding support, Professional representation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Font Awesome 5, CSS3, Sass, JavaScript
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at energy consultants in Germany.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Technical stack is WordPress-based with common SEO and font libraries.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook page link.
  10. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with hosting provider name servers.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and Font Awesome icons, hosted on Alfahosting servers. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO metadata but lacks advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility features visible. The technical stack is standard for a professional association website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gih.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gih.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.