Skip to main content

Security report for ghorzhz.nl

GHOR Zuid-Holland Zuid · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GHOR Zuid-Holland Zuid is a regional public healthcare coordination organization focused on managing medical assistance during disasters and crises within the Zuid-Holland Zuid safety region in the Netherlands. The organization provides essential services such as crisis coordination, planning, training, and advising local governments to ensure responsible healthcare delivery under all circumstances. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, targeting government bodies, healthcare providers, and the public in their region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools including Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Hotjar. The site is hosted by a Dutch registrar with DNSSEC enabled and uses HTTPS, indicating a secure and trustworthy infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility could be improved. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and DNSSEC but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, which could be areas for enhancement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is credible, secure, and professionally maintained with minor areas for improvement in security policy transparency and accessibility. The domain's long history and consistent WHOIS data support its legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ghorzhz.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GHOR Zuid-Holland Zuid operates as an essential public sector entity within the healthcare and government sectors, focusing on crisis and disaster medical coordination. Their market position is strong regionally, supported by partnerships within the safety region and a clear mandate from local governments. The business model is service-oriented, funded likely through public budgets, emphasizing preparedness, coordination, and advisory roles rather than commercial revenue streams. The website content and structure indicate a mature organization with a medium-sized team and a stable operational history since 2002. Their partnership ecosystem includes regional healthcare providers and safety organizations, enhancing their operational effectiveness and regional influence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces some privacy and security considerations but is managed with a cookie consent banner. The lack of publicly available incident response contacts or security policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a public information site but could benefit from enhanced security controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG guidelines and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GHOR Zuid-Holland Zuid
Description
De GHOR coördineert de gezondheidszorg bij rampen en crises en de voorbereiding. Het doel is gezamenlijk voorbereiden op een mogelijke grootschalige inzet en het bieden van verantwoorde zorg onder alle omstandigheden.
Key services
Coördinatie geneeskundige hulpverlening bij rampen en crises, Voorbereiding en planvorming, Advies aan overheden, Opleiden, trainen en oefenen, Repressie en nazorg
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Yoast SEO, WordPress
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Dutch, targeting regional healthcare and crisis management stakeholders.
  3. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools with cookie consent banner indicates privacy awareness.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact information publicly available.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization's profile.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The hosting provider is team.blue nl B.V., a Dutch registrar with DNSSEC enabled, indicating a secure DNS setup. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. The site structure and meta tags are well implemented for SEO. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and limited accessibility features suggest opportunities for modernization and risk reduction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ghorzhz.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ghorzhz.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.