Skip to main content

Security report for ghorhm.nl

GHOR Hollands Midden · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GHOR Hollands Midden is a regional governmental organization in the Netherlands responsible for coordinating medical assistance during large-scale incidents and crises within the Hollands Midden region. The organization acts as a bridge between healthcare providers and safety partners to ensure effective crisis preparedness and response. Their website reflects a professional and authoritative presence with comprehensive information about their services, crisis organization, and advisory roles. The site targets healthcare institutions, safety partners, local governments, and event organizers, emphasizing collaboration and preparedness. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiefirst for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a clean and consistent design. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented and GDPR compliant, supported by a consent mechanism. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure aligned with the organization's mission and regulatory requirements. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the organization's identity. No blocking or WAF challenges were detected, allowing full content accessibility and analysis. The site scores highly on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility, making it a trustworthy and professional resource for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ghorhm.nl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GHOR Hollands Midden holds a key position as the regional authority for medical crisis coordination in the Hollands Midden safety region. Their competitive advantage lies in their governmental mandate and established network connecting healthcare and safety partners. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on crisis management, advisory, training, and event safety consultation. Revenue streams are likely government-funded, reflecting their public service role. The target customers include hospitals, ambulance services, GGD, municipalities, and event organizers. Growth indicators include active engagement in digital resilience exercises and 25 years of operational history. The partnership ecosystem includes Veiligheidsregio Hollands Midden and GGD GHOR Nederland. Strategic observations highlight their role as a trusted intermediary and knowledge hub in crisis preparedness and response within the healthcare and safety sectors.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible security headers missing from the content analysis, though explicit header verification is recommended. The use of consent management tools and absence of exposed sensitive data indicate good data protection practices. There is no evidence of incident response contact channels or vulnerability disclosure policies, which could be areas for improvement. Compliance with GDPR is supported by clear privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears mature given the organization's role in crisis management, but formal security policy documentation on the site is absent. Overall, the site is secure for visitors and aligns with best practices for governmental healthcare organizations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and consent management tools for compliance and security.
  5. Enhance data retention policy disclosures related to analytics and user data to strengthen privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GHOR Hollands Midden
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GHOR Hollands Midden
Description
GHOR Hollands Midden coördinates medical assistance during disasters and crises in the Hollands Midden region. They connect healthcare and safety networks to prepare and respond effectively to large incidents.
Key services
Coordination of medical assistance during crises, Advisory on crisis prevention and preparation, Training and exercises for crisis functionaries, Event safety advice, Risk management consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Cookiefirst Consent Management
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiefirst Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Dutch language.
  2. Strong focus on healthcare crisis coordination in the Hollands Midden region.
  3. Professional and modern Drupal 10 CMS implementation.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  5. Clear contact information including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  6. Active social media presence on LinkedIn.
  7. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  8. Use of Google Tag Manager and Cookiefirst for analytics and consent.
  9. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a robust and scalable platform. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiefirst indicates a mature approach to analytics and privacy management. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. The site structure is clear with semantic HTML and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. There is no explicit hosting provider information, but the domain and SSL configuration suggest a professional hosting environment. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ghorhm.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ghorhm.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.