Skip to main content

Security report for ghezzo.at

Ghezzo GmbH · Real Estate · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ghezzo GmbH is a small Austrian company specializing in B2B seminars, conferences, and consulting services primarily targeting professionals in sectors such as real estate, hospitality, and education. The company maintains a professional online presence with a well-structured website built on the Contao CMS platform, leveraging modern frontend technologies like Bootstrap 5 and Swiper.js. The website offers comprehensive information about events, seminars, and consulting offerings, supported by active social media channels and a newsletter subscription mechanism. However, the technical infrastructure shows critical security shortcomings, notably the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which significantly undermines the site's security posture. While privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and a detailed privacy policy, the lack of security headers and slow page load times further impact the overall security and user experience. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain registration consistent with the company's business claims. Strategic improvements in security and performance are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ghezzo.at

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market providing specialized B2B events and consulting services, focusing on knowledge sharing and professional development. Its business model revolves around organizing seminars and conferences, supplemented by consulting and workshops. The presence of sustainability and ESG topics indicates alignment with current market trends. The company leverages partnerships, such as with confare.at, to extend its reach. Revenue streams likely include event fees, consulting contracts, and possibly sponsorships. The target customer segments are business professionals and organizations seeking expertise in leadership, management, and sector-specific knowledge. Growth indicators include a regularly updated blog, event calendar, and active social media engagement. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and professional content, supporting its market position.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to risks such as data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No security headers are implemented, and there is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate some attention to data protection, but critical gaps remain in transport security and HTTP security headers. The lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption features further weakens the SSL/TLS configuration. These vulnerabilities could impact business operations by eroding user trust and exposing the company to compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security with preload and includeSubDomains.
  3. Optimize website performance to reduce load times, including resource minification and caching strategies.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update all third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ghezzo GmbH
VAT number
ATU69363789
Registration number
FN 429976 v
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Contao Open Source CMS platform, utilizing Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and uses Flatpickr for date selection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. However, performance is suboptimal with a load time exceeding 6 seconds and a large page size (~218 KB). The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents significant technical debt. The site uses modern JavaScript and CSS but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured JSON-LD data. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires security and performance enhancements to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ghezzo.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ghezzo.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.