Skip to main content

Security report for ggdkennemerland.nl

GGD Kennemerland · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GGD Kennemerland operates as a regional public health organization serving the Kennemerland area in the Netherlands. The website provides comprehensive health-related services including youth health care, vaccinations, infectious disease control, ambulance services, and environmental health advice. It targets residents, parents, healthcare professionals, and local municipalities. The organization is positioned as a key regional health authority and partner under the Veiligheidsregio Kennemerland umbrella. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics, GTranslate for multilingual support, and ReadSpeaker for accessibility. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with a clear navigation structure and professional design. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting good privacy compliance. However, explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts are absent, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with GDPR requirements. The domain registration uses privacy protection, which is justified for this type of public organization. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ggdkennemerland.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GGD Kennemerland holds a strong position as a regional public health service provider, focusing on preventive health, vaccinations, and health research. Its business model is government-funded public service, targeting a broad audience including children, parents, healthcare professionals, and municipalities. The organization benefits from partnerships with Veiligheidsregio Kennemerland and related safety and health entities. The website supports outreach and engagement through multilingual content and social media channels, indicating a mature digital presence. Growth indicators include active news updates and health monitoring reports. The partnership ecosystem includes regional safety and employment sites, enhancing its community integration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. The absence of explicit security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the HTML content analysis. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public health website but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing more detailed data retention and privacy compliance information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GGD Kennemerland
Description
GGD Kennemerland is de organisatie en samenwerkingspartner voor een goede gezondheid van alle inwoners uit de regio.
Key services
Youth health care, Vaccinations, Infectious disease control, Ambulance care, Health research and advice, Environmental health advice
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, ReadSpeaker, GTranslate
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
GTranslate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional public health service portal for Kennemerland, Netherlands.
  2. Content is in Dutch with multiple language options via GTranslate.
  3. Uses Drupal 10 CMS with modern web technologies.
  4. Includes cookie consent banner and privacy policy.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact info.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Contact information includes phone number and contact form but no direct email addresses.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and YouTube.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  10. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, indicating a solid technical foundation. Integration with Google Tag Manager and GTranslate shows a focus on analytics and multilingual accessibility. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets efficiently and includes accessibility tools like ReadSpeaker. Performance is moderate, with good mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable technologies in use. Opportunities exist to optimize security headers and improve incident response readiness. The technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ggdkennemerland.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ggdkennemerland.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.