AI Media Network Inc · Media · N/a
Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
GoFuckYourself.com (GFY) operates as an adult webmaster forum providing a platform for affiliate marketers and adult webmasters to discuss business, share resources, and trade content and services. The site has a long history dating back to 1996 and serves a niche market within the adult media industry. Its business model centers on community engagement and advertising revenue, supported by a large volume of forum threads and posts. The company behind the site is AI Media Network Inc, which appears to be the parent entity managing the platform. The website's content is adult-oriented, targeting mature audiences involved in adult affiliate marketing and webmaster activities. Technically, the site runs on the vBulletin 3.8.8 forum software, which is outdated and may pose security risks. The technology stack includes legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.2 and YUI, alongside Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting details are partially obscured but DNS is managed via Cloudflare. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization, with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC are implemented, and privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. From a security perspective, the site benefits from a long-established domain with transfer protection and uses Cloudflare DNS, but lacks modern security best practices such as DNSSEC, security headers, and updated software. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site collects user credentials via login forms but does not display explicit security measures for data protection. Overall, the security posture is moderate with notable gaps that should be addressed to reduce risk. The overall risk assessment indicates a moderately trustworthy but technically outdated platform with adult content that requires enhanced security and privacy measures. Strategic recommendations include updating software, implementing DNSSEC, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and adding security headers to improve compliance and user trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention gfy.com, from OffSeq Breach.
5 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gfy.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with gfy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gfy.com.