Skip to main content

Security report for gfleaks.com

Aylo Premium Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reality Kings is a well-established adult entertainment company operating a large portfolio of premium adult video websites. The company offers subscription-based access to a vast library of HD reality porn videos featuring amateur and professional performers. The website is professionally designed with modern web technologies, including React.js and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for security. It demonstrates good privacy compliance with clear privacy and cookie policies, as well as legal disclaimers and age verification mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, although the presence of a known parent company and trusted payment processors mitigates this risk. Overall, the site maintains a strong security posture with HTTPS, security headers, and secure session management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gfleaks.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Reality Kings holds a leading position in the adult entertainment market, targeting adult consumers seeking reality-based pornographic content. Its business model centers on subscription memberships with access to multiple niche sub-sites, enhancing customer retention and market segmentation. The company leverages affiliate marketing and trusted payment processors to drive revenue. The brand is consistent and trusted within the industry, supported by compliance with legal requirements such as 18 U.S.C. 2257 record keeping. The lack of direct contact information on the site is a minor drawback but common in this industry for privacy reasons.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to prevent automated abuse, and several security headers to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. Session and authentication cookies are properly named and managed. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the site could improve by publishing explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and a security.txt file to enhance transparency and vulnerability disclosure readiness. Accessibility compliance is basic and could be enhanced to improve inclusivity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  2. Enhance Content-Security-Policy headers with reporting to strengthen defense against XSS attacks.
  3. Provide clearer and accessible contact information for security and customer support inquiries.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aylo Premium Ltd.
Description
Reality Kings is a premium adult entertainment website offering over 10,000 full HD videos featuring amateur and professional adult content from over 45 sites including Dare Dorm, Money Talks, and Moms Bang Teens. It targets adult audiences interested in reality porn with a focus on curvy and amateur performers.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Membership access, Affiliate programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React.js, Flickity carousel, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Probiller payment integration
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Session and auth cookies with proper naming
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (UA-117773996-1)
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained adult entertainment platform with extensive video content.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Strong legal compliance with 2257 records and privacy policies.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. Multiple sub-sites and brands under the parent company Aylo Premium Ltd.
  7. Explicit adult content with age verification and disclaimers.
  8. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React.js framework with client-side rendering and uses Flickity for carousel UI components. It integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection and Probiller for payment processing. The site is well-optimized for desktop and mobile devices, with good SEO practices including meta tags and canonical links. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable and secure adult content delivery platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gfleaks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gfleaks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.