Skip to main content

Security report for gfk-e.com

GfK Entertainment · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GfK Entertainment operates as an official chart provider and market research entity specializing in entertainment sectors such as music, books, games, and video. The company offers authoritative charts and market data primarily targeting industry professionals and media stakeholders in Germany. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive content and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, incorporating Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious user tracking. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy verification, although the website content and social media presence support a credible business identity. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response policies. Overall, the site is well-structured and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 28 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gfk-e.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
75
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gfk-e.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
37
Employees
0
Customers
37
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
32%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gfk-e.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GfK Entertainment holds a strong market position as an official chart provider in Germany, delivering valuable market research and entertainment data. Their business model revolves around data services and reports, catering to media and entertainment industry professionals. The company leverages a professional digital presence with consistent branding and a moderate-sized operation. The lack of visible direct contact details on the website may limit immediate customer engagement but is offset by active social media channels. The company appears to maintain a privacy-conscious approach with Matomo analytics and cookie consent. The missing WHOIS data is a notable anomaly that should be investigated to ensure domain ownership transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage implied and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that blocks cookies and storage when declined. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-friendly tracking over more invasive services. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved with additional headers, documented policies, and clearer contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  2. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Add clear company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to enhance business credibility and user support.
  5. Regularly audit and update the SSL/TLS configuration to maintain excellent encryption standards and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GfK Entertainment
Description
GfK Entertainment is an official chart provider and market research company supplying entertainment charts and market data primarily in the music, book, games, and video sectors.
Key services
Entertainment charts (music, video, games, books), Market research data, Reports such as Book Market Report
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery, Bootstrap 3, Slick Carousel, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap 3, T3 Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • Blocking of cookies/localStorage/sessionStorage via script
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URLs (https:// in scripts and images)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer
  6. Social media presence on Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn
  7. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with Bootstrap 3 and jQuery, supplemented by Slick Carousel for UI elements and Matomo for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The technical stack is somewhat dated (Bootstrap 3) but still functional. No broken elements or errors were observed. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gfk-e.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gfk-e.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.